Hi!
Awesome idea. Seeing this being viable in a platform like Apache OpenWhisk
would be great too. I keep hearing customers asking about lightweight
containers to run Camel context. :)
+++1
Zanini
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 5:31 AM, Antonin Stefanutti
wrote:
> Hi Nicola,
>
> I love the idea.
>
Hi Cameleers,
I've experimented a bit with jitpack.io[1] to get the Java 10 build running.
I've created a branch/build to test this using the daily build[2], the
build failed but I think it's because the node was disconnected from
Jenkins -- but the Java 10 stage of the build was successfully buil
GitHub user lzh3636 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2426
CAMEL-12650 Log messages that do not match with their method function
The description of the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-12650
There are some possible copy and pas
Github user dmvolod closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2425
---
GitHub user dmvolod opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2425
CAMEL-12624: ActiveMQ Artemis AMQP integration issue with topic prefix
hardcoded
hardcode
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/dmvolo
Cool.
I thought this was backported.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-12584
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 at 15:41, Andrea Cosentino
wrote:
> We are going to release 2.21.x so it shouldn't be a blocker.
>
> --
> Andrea Cosentino
> --
> Apache Camel PMC Chai
We are going to release 2.21.x so it shouldn't be a blocker.
--
Andrea Cosentino
--
Apache Camel PMC Chair
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix PMC Member
Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com
Twitter: @oscerd2
Github: oscerd
On Friday, July 13, 2018, 2:38:40 PM G
Hi,
This test failure is so often. In master and 2.22.x branches.
Not sure if it is blocking for release, but a notice before release.
https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel/job/master/467/testReport/
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:23 PM Andrea Cosentino
wrote:
> Obviously, thanks for the taking ca
Github user oscerd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2424
---
Obviously, thanks for the taking care of this.
--
Andrea Cosentino
--
Apache Camel PMC Chair
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix PMC Member
Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com
Twitter: @oscerd2
Github: oscerd
On Friday, July 13, 2018, 11:21:44 AM GMT+2, Andrea
Gregor are you able to cut the release for 2.21.2? Maybe we need to cut also
the last release for 2.20, the 2.20.4.
Thoughts?
--
Andrea Cosentino
--
Apache Camel PMC Chair
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix PMC Member
Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com
Twitter: @
Hi Nicola,
I love the idea.
I just wonder whether YAML/JSON is an expressive enough format in the long
term. But as you’ve mentioned, starting simple would enable experimenting some
very interesting / promising optimisations. So it seems worth taking that path,
instead of trying to embed a com
Hi Nicola,
+1 on the idea and the great write-up, seems to me like something that
we should definitely explore further.
I also like the "Kamel" name :)
zoran
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 1:30 AM, Nicola Ferraro wrote:
> Hi Cameleers,
> it's now passed some time since I started thinking about a new p
Of course you need to port them to go lang, the project is not intended to
be a drop in replacement for camel but a companion for integration that do
not require all the power and flexibility the jvm implementation provide
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 at 08:55, Willem Jiang wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> You are
14 matches
Mail list logo
