GitHub user sowjanyamudimala opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2552
CAMEL-12484: setting default idletimeout for httpclient
setting default idletimeout as per the suggestion in the ticket.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
lburgazzoli closed pull request #157: runtime: refine groovy dsl
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/157
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a foreign pull request
oscerd closed pull request #156: Add option to run from URL
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/156
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use
oscerd closed issue #137: Add option to run from URL
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/137
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL
oscerd commented on issue #156: Add option to run from URL
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/156#issuecomment-427043350
@nicolaferraro
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
nicolaferraro closed pull request #155: doc: add initial documentation about
integration DSLs
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/155
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As
oscerd commented on issue #156: Add option to run from URL
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/156#issuecomment-427036675
Done
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
oscerd commented on issue #156: Add option to run from URL
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/156#issuecomment-427035897
You mean the same also on the control on Filesystem I suppose, I'll update
there too.
This is
oscerd commented on issue #156: Add option to run from URL
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/156#issuecomment-427035452
Done.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
nicolaferraro commented on a change in pull request #156: Add option to run
from URL
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/156#discussion_r222672852
##
File path: pkg/client/cmd/run.go
##
@@ -97,10 +98,19 @@ func (*runCmdOptions) validateArgs(cmd *cobra.Command,
nicolaferraro commented on a change in pull request #156: Add option to run
from URL
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/156#discussion_r222672917
##
File path: pkg/client/cmd/run.go
##
@@ -97,10 +98,19 @@ func (*runCmdOptions) validateArgs(cmd *cobra.Command,
oscerd commented on issue #156: Add option to run from URL
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/156#issuecomment-427016574
I didn't add any option, I checked if the fileName provided is an url http
or https and work in that direction
oscerd opened a new pull request #156: Add option to run from URL
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/156
Fixes #137
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2551
---
GitHub user dmvolod opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2551
CAMEL-12786: Option readLockLoggingLevel not working for SFTP changed read
lock strategy
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user onderson opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2550
CAMEL-12853 - disable SftpConsumerDisconnectTest
I think it will be better to mark this test case as ignore.
the reason for this is that the error case is simulated with processor to
Amazing job Guillaume and welcome back !
---
Luca Burgazzoli
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 10:38 AM Nicola Ferraro wrote:
>
> That's really nice!
> Working on Camel 3 is something we've deferred for a long time and the kind
> of refactoring you've been doing is the right way to start IMO.
>
> Great
That's really nice!
Working on Camel 3 is something we've deferred for a long time and the kind
of refactoring you've been doing is the right way to start IMO.
Great job!
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 9:29 AM Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is really great to have you back and what an awesome work
Hi David & Cameleers,
sorry for the late reply,
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:07 PM David Karlsen wrote:
>
> Maybe bump to boot 2.1 and spring 5.1 for 2.23?
I found that there were test failures in camel-spring-boot when trying
2.1.0.M4 that were not present on 2.1.0.M3, didn't have the time to
Hi
This is really great to have you back and what an awesome work you
have been doing.
Its great with new set of eyes on the big chunk of camel-core.
We should definitly continue on this work for Camel 3 IMHO.
First we should get Camel 2.23 out of the door, and then we can focus
on Camel 3.
For
Awesome !
Thanks ! I have some WIP around camel on karaf as well.
Regards
JB
Le 4 oct. 2018 à 08:55, à 08:55, Andrea Cosentino
a écrit:
>Hey Guillaume, Thanks a lot! This is a wonderful start for Camel 3.x
>work!
>
>Many thanks! I'll take a look at the branch!
>
>
>
>--
>Andrea Cosentino
Hey Guillaume, Thanks a lot! This is a wonderful start for Camel 3.x work!
Many thanks! I'll take a look at the branch!
--
Andrea Cosentino
--
Apache Camel PMC Chair
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix PMC Member
Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com
Twitter:
22 matches
Mail list logo
