Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 3.20.1

+1 (binding) On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 3:47 AM James Netherton wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 at 15:54, James Netherton > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel Quarkus 3.20.1 LTS. > > > > Highlights: > > > > * Camel 4.10.4 LTS > > * Quarkus 3.20.0 LTS > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 4.4.5 (LTS)

+1 (binding) On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 2:55 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 11:24 AM Gregor Zurowski > wrote: > > > > Hi Everyone: > > > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 4.4.5, a new patch release with > > 12 fixes and improvement

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 4.8.0 (LTS) - 2nd Attempt

+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 4:56 PM Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 4.8.0, a new release with 185 > new features and improvements. > > This second release candidate includes the following fixes missing in > the initial attempt: > > - http

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 4.7.0

+1 (binding) Thank you Gregor! On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 11:13 AM Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 4.7.0, a new release with 198 > new features and improvements. > > Release notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1235

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 4.5.0

+1 (binding) Thanks Gregor! On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 7:00 AM Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 4.5.0, a new LTS release with > 151 new features and improvements. > > Release notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=123

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 4.4.0 (LTS)

+1 (binding) On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 3:08 PM Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 4.4.0, a new LTS release with > 152 new features and improvements. > > Release notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12353989&projectId=

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel K 2.0.0

+1 (binding) Thanks for this Pasquale! On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 8:14 AM Pasquale Congiusti < pasquale.congiu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel K 2.0.0. The release also contains > the Camel K CRD 2.0.0, a Java client for Kubernetes Camel K CRDs. This > relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.5.0

+1 (binding) On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 6:42 PM Peter Palaga wrote: > Hi, > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.5.0. > > Highlights: > > * Camel 3.7.0 > * Fixed issues: > https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/milestone/9?closed=1 > * All commits: > https://github.com/apache/camel-q

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.4.0

+1 (binding) On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 2:19 PM Alexandre Gallice wrote: > Hi Cameleers, > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.4.0. > > The main difference against Camel Quarkus 1.3.0 are listed below: > > * Upgraded to Quarkus 1.10.0.Final > * Addition of native support for 7 extens

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-CR2

+1 (binding) On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 3:07 PM Peter Palaga wrote: > Hi, > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-CR2 (a followup of > the scrapped 1.0.0-CR1). Thanks Luca for fixing the dependency issue! > > Highlights (same as 1.0.0-CR1): > * Camel 3.3.0 > * Quarkus 1.5.0.Final >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Camel-kafka-connector 0.1.0

+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 9:34 AM Andrea Tarocchi wrote: > Hello all: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel-kafka-connector 0.1.0 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1205 > > Tag: > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M3

+1 (binding) On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 8:54 AM Andrea Cosentino wrote: > Hello all: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M3 > > This release contains new extensions, bug fixes and it has been updated to > Quarkus 1.2.0.Final and Camel 3.0.1 > > Staging repository: > https://rep

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M1

Thanks Andrea! +1 (binding) from me. On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 8:37 AM Andrea Cosentino wrote: > Hello all: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M1 > > This release contains new extensions, bug fixes and has been updated to > Quarkus 1.0.1.Final and Camel 3.0.0 > > Staging repos

Re: camel-kafka-connector

gt; Il giorno mer 4 dic 2019 alle ore 09:23 Claus Ibsen < > claus.ib...@gmail.com> > > ha scritto: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:58 PM Andrea Cosentino > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 to avoid ip clearance for me. > > > > >

Re: camel-kafka-connector

Yeah, IMO we don't need to go through the incubator grant/ip-clearance. All 5 contributors are from Red Hat so we don't need to track down anybody else to give a +1. Would it help if all contributors chimed in here with a +1? On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:06 PM Andrea Cosentino wrote: > Frankly I do

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 3.0.0

+1 (binding) On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 5:15 AM Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 3.0.0, a new major release with > 1012 improvements and fixes. > > Release notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315691&projectId=1231

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 0.3.0

+1 (binding) Thanks for preparing this Andrea! On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 8:21 AM Andrea Cosentino wrote: > Hello all: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel Quarkus 0.3.0 > > This release contains new extensions and it has been updated to Camel > 3.0.0-RC3 and Quarkus 0.26.1. > > Staging repo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 3.0.0-RC2 (Release Candidate 2)

+1 (binding) On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 4:50 AM Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 3.0.0-RC2 (Release Candidate > 2), the second release candidate towards a new 3.0.0 major release > with another 94 improvements and fixes. > > Release notes: > https://is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel-K Runtime 0.3.0 (take 2)

+1 (binding) On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 5:01 AM Andrea Cosentino wrote: > Hello all: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel-K runtime 0.3.0 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1122 > > Tag: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=camel-k-r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.23.0

+1 (binding) On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 4:57 PM Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.23.0, a new minor release for > the camel-2.23.x branch with 262 improvements and bug fixes. This is > also the first release to support Spring Boot 2.1. > > Release no

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.22.1

Thanks Gregor! +1 (binding) On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 10:19 AM Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.22.1, the first patch release > for the camel-2.22.x branch with 47 improvements and bug fixes. > > Release notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.5

+1 (binding) On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.19.5, the last planned patch > release for branch camel-2.19.x. This release includes 42 fixes and > improvements. > > Release notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.20.3

+1 (binding) On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.20.3, a new patch release for > branch camel-2.20.x. This release includes 33 fixes and improvements. > > Release notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Release

Re: [VOTE] Migrate Apache repo to GitBox

+1 On Oct 9, 2017 6:04 AM, "Luca Burgazzoli" wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > there is a new git service at Apache named gitbox which provides a > better integration with GitHub. This new service allows to host our > read/write repo on GitHub so we can handle PRs straight from from > GitHub instead of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.1

+1 (binding). Thanks Gregor! On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.18.1, a new patch release > that includes ~68 fixes and improvements. > > Release notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > vers

Re: [1/3] camel git commit: CAMEL-10381 - fix NPE from component configuration

Oops. I'll revert that pom later if you haven't already. On Oct 11, 2016 5:06 PM, "Claus Ibsen" wrote: > Hi Jon > > Those -starter modules should not be generated. They do not support Spring > Boot. > > I wonder if your Camel tooling directory is out of date, and using > some old build of the pl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

+1 (binding) Camel in Action v2 tests look good. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jon Anstey wrote: > Running the Camel in Action tests against 2.18 now, will report back soon. > Totally agree on that BOM import idea :-) > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Claus Ibsen wr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

Running the Camel in Action tests against 2.18 now, will report back soon. Totally agree on that BOM import idea :-) On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > Thanks, btw you may also need to update some other versions like > spring-boot to 1.4.1 and cxf, activemq, etc to use s

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade Camel to Karaf 4

+1 On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Andrea Cosentino < ancosen1...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > I agree with Daniel. > > Anyway this is something we can surely work on for the next release. > -- > Andrea Cosentino > -- > Apache Camel PMC Member > Apache Karaf Comm

Re: [VOTE] Camel 2.17.3

+1 (binding) On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release Camel 2.17.3 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1052/ < > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1052/> > > Tag: > htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.16.3

+1 On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.16.3, a new patch release > that includes 75+ fixes and improvements. > > Release notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12334721&projectId=12311

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.16.2

+1 On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.16.2 that has 70+ fixes and > improvements. > > Release notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12334167 > > Staging repositor

Re: Donation of Camel-MLLP component to Apache Camel Community

Also another benefit of doing this via a PR is that you will have commits listed here https://github.com/apache/camel/graphs/contributors :-) On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Jon Anstey wrote: > Hey guys, > > If everything is ready, a PR based off master [1] would be nicer for the &

Re: Donation of Camel-MLLP component to Apache Camel Community

Hey guys, If everything is ready, a PR based off master [1] would be nicer for the reviewer rather than copying in code manually from hqstevenson/camel-mllp. We mention GitHub PRs here https://camel.apache.org/contributing.html Thanks! Jon [1] https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master On Mon,

Re: [VOTE] Camel 2.16.0

+1 Thanks Dan! On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.16.0. There was a TON of work > done over the last 6 months to get this ready so it’s time to get it out. > > Tag: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=camel.git;a=tag;h=a9d

Re: "advanced" label for params?

Yeah, I like the idea of an "advanced" label for non-common options. I've often been overwhelmed myself at the list of options for some components :-) I imagine it also clutters up UIs for the sake of showing options only a small number of people may ever use. Cheers, Jon On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2

Re: [VOTE] Apache Camel 2.15.1

+1 (binding) Thanks Willem! On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.15.1, a patch release coming > > with about 55 issues fixed. > > Release notes: > 2.15.1 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12329441&styleNa

Re: [VOTE] Camel 2.15.0 & Camel 2.13.4

+1 On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.15.0, a major release coming with > about 506 issues fixed, and Camel 2.13.4 , a patch release coming with > about 81 issues fixed. > > Release notes: > > 2.15.0 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/s

Re: Closing down on Apache Camel 2.15.0 release

I just fixed an Avro issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8453. It wasn't working at all from spring or blueprint so would be nice to make it into 2.15 :-) On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > Yeah, it looks like Camel 2.15 is ready to go. > As we just commit some

Re: [VOTE] Release Camel 2.14.1

+1 On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.14.1, a patch release coming > with about 139 issues fixed. > > Release notes: > 2.14.1 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12326054&styleName=Html&projectId=12311211

Re: [2/5] camel git commit: CAMEL-8110 - google mail component

Fixed now. Looks like the Eclipse source cleanup function cleaned up a bit too much :-) On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Jon Anstey wrote: > Yep, will take a look. > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Willem Jiang > wrote: > >> Hi Jon, >> >> The build of new add

Re: [2/5] camel git commit: CAMEL-8110 - google mail component

Yep, will take a look. On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > Hi Jon, > > The build of new added camel-google-mail component is failed[1]. > Could you take a look at it? > > [1] > https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.trunk.notest/2237/org.apache.camel$camel-google-mail/console > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.14.0 (the second try)

Thanks Willem. Looks good to me +1 On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.14.0, a major release coming > with about 399 issues fixed. > > Release notes: > 2.14.0 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12326054&sty

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.14.0

Nice catch Aki. Fixed google drive and box example SNAPSHOT versions with: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/repo?p=camel.git;a=commit;h=a3d5c1c9414a274006ad2a1d6aa48578bd74bb13 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/repo?p=camel.git;a=commit;h=43161eff52b0727c2a3fdb0b0900709bd3

Re: git commit: Fix typeconverter issue

lish) > http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > On September 9, 2014 at 6:23:29 PM, Jon Anstey (jans...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Ah spotted a package name used in camel-core so I switched to that. Will > > double check today wh

Re: git commit: Fix typeconverter issue

Ah spotted a package name used in camel-core so I switched to that. Will double check today which one I need to use. On Sep 9, 2014 3:02 AM, "Claus Ibsen" wrote: > Hi > > In the type converter file you should use the FQN of the class name, > so the change was in fact not correct. > > > On Tue, Se

Re: Release date of Camel 2.14.0

the source code any more. > > > > -- > Willem Jiang > > Red Hat, Inc. > Web: http://www.redhat.com > Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) > http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > On September 8, 2

Re: Release date of Camel 2.14.0

I just sneaked in a component for Google Drive and would be great if we could delay the RC cut by a day so I can get the docs in order. Cheers, Jon On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > I’m planing to cut the Camel 2.14.0 RC tomorrow if there is no last minute > change. > > -- >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.13.2/2.12.4

+1 for both. Thanks Willem! On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Willem Jiang wrote: > Hi > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.13.2 and 2.12.4. > > Release notes: > 2.13.2 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12326817&styleName=Html&projectId=12311211 > > 2.12.4

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.13.0

+1 On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.13.0, a major release coming > with about 480 issues fixed. > > Release notes: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12324786&styleName=&projectId=12311211 > > Staging

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.4

+1 On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.11.4, a patch release coming with > about 26 issues fixed. > > Release notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12311211&version=12325645 > > Staging repo: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.12.3

+1 On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.12.3, a patch release coming with > about 128 issues fixed. > > Release notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12311211&version=12325593 > > Staging repo:

Re: [DISCUSS] - Turn off JMX load statistics by default?

Good idea. +1 On Feb 10, 2014 5:45 AM, "Claus Ibsen" wrote: > Hi > > Background > http://camel.apache.org/camel-jmx > > In Camel we have a load statistics in JMX that calculates a "load" per > 1, 5, and 15 minutes - which is similar to the concept on unix such as > the top command (load avg) > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.3

+1 On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > A bit overdue, this is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.11.3, a patch > release coming with about 116 issues fixed. > > Release notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12311211&version=12325024 > >

Re: git commit: CAMEL-7023: Added hawtio goal to camel maven plugin.

Even if there is this cycle, I'm pretty sure hawtio isn't tied to a specific version of camel so it shouldnt be an issue. On 2013-12-01 9:40 AM, "Jon Anstey" wrote: > I think this is the first possible technical issue in this thread... > Although I haven't looked

Re: git commit: CAMEL-7023: Added hawtio goal to camel maven plugin.

I think this is the first possible technical issue in this thread... Although I haven't looked at the dependency graph myself to see if its actually an issue :-) We certainly do not have the requirement to brand and control every 3rd party tool we interact with. Like, we deploy poms that specify a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.10.7

+1 On 2013-09-15 5:26 PM, "Christian Müller" wrote: > After 2 month of development, we have a new bug fix release candidate > apache-camel-2.10.7 ready. > It comes with 63 issues resolved: new features, improvements and bug fixes > [1]. > You can find the release notes here [2]. > This will be th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.12.0 (RC2)

+1 On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > After 5 month of development, we have a new minor release candidate > apache-camel-2.12.0 ready. > It comes with 350 issues resolved: new features, improvements and bug > fixes[1] > . You can find the release notes here [2]. > > The issu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.12.0

Dhiraj has a camel-facebook component almost ready (see CAMEL-6676). Would be nice to include this in 2.12 if its completed soon. On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Willem jiang wrote: > After running the camel-example unit tests and camel in action unit tests, > everything looks good. > Here is m

Re: [IDEA] - Having a parent maven pom.xml for only the dependency versions

When using import scope though you only get managed dependencies - no properties. Need to inherit a parent pom to get properties. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:15 AM, James Strachan wrote: > I wonder if we should experiment with a BOM file? > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14874966/how-to-use-b

Re: [IDEA] - Having a parent maven pom.xml for only the dependency versions

I like the idea of having a pom just for versions. We could use Babak's proposal but instead of introducing another level of inheritance, just make one of the current top level poms mostly properties and push everything else into the other pom. So, either org.apache.camel:camel or org.apache.camel:

Re: Release of Camel 2.12.0

Sounds good to me. There are a lot of cool new features and components that would be good to get released. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Willem jiang wrote: > Hi team, > > As Camel 2.12-SNAPSHOT is sharped [1], I suggest we would consider the > release of Camel 2.12.0 this month. > I'd like t

Re: fw: hello

Please don't click this link. Some hacker in Belarus hijacked my account today and sent this out. Cheers, Jon On 2013-07-21 2:23 PM, "Jon Anstey" wrote: > http://personeelsservice-kwb.nl/tcxfv/hniyxuwxstblt > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

fw: hello

http://personeelsservice-kwb.nl/tcxfv/hniyxuwxstblt janstey 7/21/2013 5:52:25 PM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.1

+1 On 2013-07-10 1:04 AM, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.11.1, a patch release coming with > about 110 issues fixed. > > Release notes: > https://issues.apache.org/**jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?** > projectId=12311211&version=**12323967

Re: Camel manual in pdf....

+1 #5 but would like to keep html manual. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > I vote for #5 > > It will just keep haunting us in the future. With new problems etc. > > Its 2013 and people read online docs / google / stackoverflow / watch > videos / etc. > The camel pdf manual

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.10.5

+1 On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Christian Müller < christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote: > After 4 month of development, we have a new bug fix release candidate > apache-camel-2.10.5 ready. > It comes with 108 issues resolved [1]. You can find the release notes here > [2]. > > Please find the

Re: [HEADS UP] - Optimzing routing engine to reduce stack frames in use during routing

Wow. Nice improvement! On 2013-05-21 8:18 AM, "Claus Ibsen" wrote: > Hi > > Okay so we got some good headway now. > > The sample use case on 2.11 has a stacktrace of about 40 lines (without > JMX). > And on trunk we are down to 17 now (without JMX) and +2 if JMX enabled. > > That is reducing the

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo

Git repo at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git looks good to me. On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking > infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My full test > over the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.9.7

+1 On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Christian Müller < christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote: > After 6 weeks of development, we have a new patch release candidate > apache-camel-2.9.7 ready. It comes with 14 issues resolved [1]. > This will be the last planned Camel 2.9.x release. We will disconti

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.0 (take 4)

+1 On 2013-04-17 4:11 PM, "Christian Müller" wrote: > After 9 month of development, we have a new minor release candidate > apache-camel-2.11.0 ready. > It comes with 679 issues resolved: new features, improvements and bug fixes > [1]. You can find the release notes here [2]. > > Please find the

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo

Yeah, sounds fine. That would eliminate the sometimes annoying delay between svn and git mirror. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us > already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.

Re: [DISCUSS] - Rename camel-redis and camel-neo4j to include spring in their name

+1 makes sense to me. On 2013-03-09 5:02 AM, "Claus Ibsen" wrote: > Hi > > These are two new components in the upcoming Camel 2.11. > > These are spring dependent and requires using Spring Data / Spring at > runtime. > As we have a number of Camel components that requires spring, we > usually hav

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.9.6

+1 On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > We have a new patch release candidate apache-camel-2.9.6 ready. It comes > with approximately 63 issues resolved: improvements and bug fixes [1]. > > Please find the staging repo here: > https://repository.apache.org/**content/reposito

Re: [Camel 3 discussion] Components releases

I wouldn't imagine these separate component releases would be able to have differing dependency versions anyway. So no win there. We would get into the situation of having multiple versions of the same lib being used across Camel. That is one of the nice things about releasing everything at once,

Re: [DISCUSS][CAMEL-3.0] Does camel need a web console

+1 to remove the web console for Camel 3.0 (option #2) On 2013-01-25 8:14 PM, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote: > I'd keep this thread short and focus on achieving consensus (if possible) > on what to do with the existing console. So far it looks to me like there > is (almost(*)) consensus on not having t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.10.3

+1 On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > A new patch release candidate apache-camel-2.10.3 final is out with > approximately 74 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1]. > > Please find the staging repo here: > https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositori

Re: [DISCUSS] - Remove non Camel JARs from binary distro

+1 On Nov 6, 2012 9:18 AM, "Claus Ibsen" wrote: > Hi > > In the binary distro of Apache Camel we have in the lib directory a > number of 3rd party JARs > > lib/slf4j-api-1.6.6.jar > > lib/optional/ > commons-beanutils-1.8.3.jar > geronimo-j2ee-management_1.0_spec-1.1.jar > commons-collections-3.2

Re: [DISCUSS] - CAMEL-5534: Split package in camel-core and camel-spring

Sounds fine. +1 On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > See ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5534 > > In camel-spring we have a single @deprecated class that was part of > the earlier days (Camel 2.8 and older) where some Camel components was > dependent on Spri

Re: Jira Permissions

Hey Scott, I just added you to the camel-developers group in JIRA but it doesn't seem to have updated your user account yet. Hopefully it will be updated in an hour or so. Cheers, Jon On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote: > Hi all, > > How do I assign myself a ticket in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Camel 2.9.3 and 2.10.1

+1 On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > It's been quite a while since 2.9.2. We're long overdue for 2.9.3. It's > also a good time for 2.10.1. > > We've fixed over 135 JIRA issues for 2.9.3: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&versio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.8.6

+1 On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Christian Müller < christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote: > A new release candidate apache-camel-2.8.6 final is out with approximately > 31 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1]. > > Please find the staging repo here: > https://repository.apache.or

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.10.0 (2nd attempt)

Thanks Hadrian. The only issue I saw was that the copyright year in the notices was 2011, which is no big deal IMO. +1 On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > A new release candidate apache-camel-2.10.0 final is out with > approximately 483 issues resolved so far: improvements

Re: [VOTE] Camel MUST use valid URIs for identifying and configuring Endpoints

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > -1 > > > > a) > I am happy with the current model, and DO NOT want any changes / > implications > upon the Camel 2.x codebase. Its important for me that the current 2.x > codebase is kept stable as is. > Camel 2.10 is on the doorsteps, and Cam

Re: Zookeeper load balancing component?

Hmm.. don't believe we have that in Apache Camel right now. FYI this is in Fuse Fabric already http://fusesource.com/docs/esbent/7.0/camel_comp_ref/Fabric.html but this is not a pure ZooKeeper impl as there are some extra Fabric things built on top of ZooKeeper. Hope this helps. Cheers, Jon On S

Re: [DISCUSS] - Remove Camel 1.x only material from the wiki documentation

+1 On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > Camel 1.x has been EOL for about 1 year now > http://camel.apache.org/2010/12/17/camel-164-released.html > > In our wiki documentation we have sometime parts of the documentation, > which covers Camel 1.x details only. > > I wonder

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.8.4

Looks good to me. Very nice to see a beautiful PDF user guide in this one too :) +1 On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > A new patch release candidate apache-camel-2.8.4 is out with approximately > 88 issues resolved: improvements and bug fixes [1]. > > Please find the stag

Re: [DISCUSS] Dropping support for Camel 2.7.x

Yeah, agreed. Like we even still have the 1.x branch there. No harm in keeping them around IMO. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Saturday, December 31, 2011 7:43:26 PM Christian Müller wrote: > > When we release Camel 2.9.0 (expected in the next days) and start working >

Re: [DISCUSS] Dropping support for Camel 2.7.x

Sounds good to me. +1 On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Christian Müller < christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote: > When we release Camel 2.9.0 (expected in the next days) and start working > on Camel 2.10, I would like to cut a new release from the camel-2.7.x > branch which will be in my opinion t

Re: Unit test failure on trunk in camel-saxon

Oh wow, that is an old blog post :) I've updated it to point to the new URLs. Thanks for letting me know! Cheers, Jon On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:08 PM, bvahdat wrote: > Hi Jon, > > Thanks a lot for your commitment on this and bringing that behaviour back > into the play. > > Other than this I've

Re: Unit test failure on trunk in camel-saxon

behavior, but with > introducing new options to support this behavior. Camel is unnecessarily > too complicated as it is. If you think that can be done without introducing > new options, go for it. > > I hope this clarifies it, > Hadrian > > > > On 11/22/2011 09:53 AM

Re: Unit test failure on trunk in camel-saxon

. Define valid. Read my previous post. > Hadrian > > > On 11/22/2011 09:27 AM, Jon Anstey wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> Just seeing this thread now (was off for a few days...), of course I only >> ran the camel-core tests before committing ;) I'm going to change

Re: Unit test failure on trunk in camel-saxon

Hey guys, Just seeing this thread now (was off for a few days...), of course I only ran the camel-core tests before committing ;) I'm going to change the behavior to fail fast again such that if you want to provide XSLT via header, you will need to also specify a valid XSLT on the URI. So, it will

Re: JmsSelectorInTest failed

Yeah, good idea. I've made this change. On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Jon Anstey wrote: > > FYI took another look at this and it is not a real issue. When using > async > > sends in ActiveMQ on the produc

Re: JmsSelectorInTest failed

boil down to sync sends...). I made a fix for the test here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1202227 Cheers, Jon On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Jon Anstey wrote: > Was looking into this on Friday but didn't solve it. I'll have another > look today

Re: JmsSelectorInTest failed

lol missed that comment... glad to be back home to a fast desktop ;) On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Christian Müller < christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm a bit surprising about this failed unit test [1]. It looks like on slow > boxes like the Jenkins server and Jon's Laptop ( sorry for t

Re: JmsSelectorInTest failed

Was looking into this on Friday but didn't solve it. I'll have another look today but if someone is really interesting in digging in ActiveMQ ;) the hint is that it works when you disable async sends. On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Christian, > > I guess it depe

Re: [DISCUSS] Rules for backports

Figured I should respond to this important email... though maybe we have lazy consensus on the topic? ;) I think in general this makes a lot of sense and really, we are following most of this right now anyways. And of course, these are not hard and fast rules and we can always DISCUSS later for sp

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.9.0-RC1

o have some really nice > stuff in the patch branches. > > > > > > > Just my $0.2 > > > > Cheers! > > > > On Nov 8, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Jon Anstey wrote: > > > >> Looks like it is in the archive as this link > &g

Re: How to publish a WSDL

You are looking for a contract first web services example then right? Here is one from Camel in Action: http://camelinaction.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/chapter7/cxf/contract_first/ On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:06 AM, farha wrote: > Hi, > > I want to know the simple syntax for publishing a wsdl without

  1   2   3   >