[GitHub] camel pull request #2501: better make use of Enum#name and Enum#valueof APIs

2018-08-29 Thread bvahdat
GitHub user bvahdat opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2501 better make use of Enum#name and Enum#valueof APIs @punkhorn would you please take a look at this change? thanks. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

Re: [DISCUSS] Trunk-Code-Cleanup

2011-12-22 Thread bvahdat
Hi Christian, Great & thanks for you support :-) Don't get into hurry & let's first bring the 2.9.0 final release out the door (with or without the OSGi features-fix stuff). Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Trunk-Code-Cleanup-tp5071594p5094179.ht

Re: [DISCUSS] Trunk-Code-Cleanup

2011-12-22 Thread bvahdat
Hi, As I have already attached the first patch for [1] that would be great if a commiter would assist me on this ticket for applying the gradual patches into the trunk one after the other. As soon as this first patch is applied I will update my workspace and dig into the "next round". [1] https:

Re: ServiceMix - Camel - JMS deployment error

2011-12-21 Thread bvahdat
Hi Aliosha, I assume you're in the wrong forum and should better make use of [1] to solve your problem as you make use of ServiceMix ESB & JBI-Container as such and the issue you're encountering has nothing to do with Apache Camel. Maybe [2] can also better clarify the comparision between ServiceM

Re: [DISCUSS] Trunk-Code-Cleanup

2011-12-19 Thread bvahdat
Hadrian, Currently there's 8348 *Test.java classes on the trunk, so that finding all those empty or overlapping tests would be (at least to me) really a tough challenging task, so that I propose to keep with the context of this clean-up activity as radical as possible. Babak -- View this message

Re: [DISCUSS] Trunk-Code-Cleanup

2011-12-19 Thread bvahdat
Hi, I created a ticket [1] for tracking this issue. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4796 Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Trunk-Code-Cleanup-tp5071594p5085730.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.9.0

2011-12-15 Thread bvahdat
Hadrian, Let me try to explain what the problem I claim to be there: We assume that the vote will pass and you will promote/copy the staging repo content to the central repo and announce the release officially on the Wiki & maybe even on the User-Forum, right? Now as an example through the revis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.9.0

2011-12-15 Thread bvahdat
Hi, In the context of the tickets below (Fix Version 2.9.0 in JIRA), I see changes made on the trunk which are to be already included by the 2.9.0 final release (but all are *after* the release today @ 15.12.11 05:12 by Hadrian, see [1]). https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4777 https://

Re: [DISCUSS] Trunk-Code-Cleanup

2011-12-14 Thread bvahdat
Hi Christian, > May you can start with this after we released Camel 2.9.0 and split the > work into multiple, not so huge patches, e.g. one issue per point on your > list. Yeah, exactly. Instead of attaching a single huge diff on the ticket I intend to do it gradually (for example one patch for e

Re: [DISCUSS] Trunk-Code-Cleanup

2011-12-14 Thread bvahdat
Hi Claus, Thanks for your feedback. >> For example changing/adding serial version UUID would break backwards >> comp. So IMHO only to be done on the 2.10 release. etc I did already agree with your proposal by my original post: >> BTW, my intention is *not* to force this into the 2.9.0 final rel

Re: [DISCUSS] Trunk-Code-Cleanup

2011-12-13 Thread bvahdat
Hi again, I already messed it up with the provided links in the botom of my previous post, so here a second try: Hi Devs, As Claus has already once stated [1] thanks to my own professionalism I intend to take over the trunk code-clean-up activity :-) This task (at least to the main extend) can

[DISCUSS] Trunk-Code-Cleanup

2011-12-13 Thread bvahdat
[DISCUSS] Trunk-Cleanup Hi Devs, As Claus has already once stated [1] thanks to my own professionalism I intend to take over the trunk code-clean-up activity :-) This task (at least to the main extend) can be of course achieved in an (almost) automated manner (*even* eclipse can do that!), which

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-12 Thread bvahdat
Hi Claus, > Thanks Dan. > The svn ignore is not back to normal for IDEA users. just because of my curiosity. Does it work now for you or do you still have the same problem? Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/The-big-svn-ignore-commit-tp5044135p5067974.h

Re: code snippets broken on confluence wiki

2011-12-09 Thread bvahdat
Just as an idea: Could [1] be also relevant for this issue as well? I hit a bunch of "h3" html tags just before those lines with: Error formatting macro: snippet: java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 20, Size: 20 [1] https://studio.plugins.atlassian.com/browse/NUMHEAD-26 Babak -- View t

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-07 Thread bvahdat
Claus, Not sure if [1] is really related but just for any case. However I see your point: it used to work before that script run so that you expect it to still work *even* after that run. My apologies beforehand as I was the guilty one who started discussing [2] this. [1] http://youtrack.jetbrai

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-05 Thread bvahdat
Your second script-run beforehand today seems still to be O.K. on eclipse/subclipse for me (0 outgoing-changes), hope it'll be the same for the IDEA users as well. Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/The-big-svn-ignore-commit-tp5044135p5049254.html Sent from

Re: [Discussion] Unify prefixes http, jetty, servlet?

2011-12-05 Thread bvahdat
Hi Christian, I assume in Apache Camel we deal with URIs in general and not URLs in particular, so that the following line of code new URI("jetty:http://camel.com:1099/service";); doesn't throw any URISyntaxException on my box. As the scheme is "jetty" & the scheme-specific part of it is

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-03 Thread bvahdat
Hi, For me the issue on eclipse was actually already resolved through your svn:ignore commit on the trunk even before this commit, see [1]. Completely another point: IMHO I assume because of the same regular expression inspiration by svn, we used to have the issue [2] caused by maven. I think the

Re: The svn:ignore property isn't settled down on trunk

2011-12-02 Thread bvahdat
FYI, with the revisions that Willem & Claus [1] have already commited the issue seems to be resolved, so that while synchronizing with the trunk (subclipse in eclipse) happily I see 0 outgoing-changes. But maybe you still want to double check it. [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&rev

Re: The svn:ignore property isn't settled down on trunk

2011-12-02 Thread bvahdat
@Dan, did you have a chance to give that CXF script a try? Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/The-svn-ignore-property-isn-t-settled-down-on-trunk-tp5035110p5041830.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: The svn:ignore property isn't settled down on trunk

2011-11-30 Thread bvahdat
Hi Willem, Thanks a lot for that quick fix. IMHO the best would be if we could consistently overcontrol the ignore list as the following so that the rules apply for *all* of us no matter what the client we use: - for svn dummies (like me) through the svn:ignore property of each given folder belo

The svn:ignore property isn't settled down on trunk

2011-11-30 Thread bvahdat
Hi Devs, That would be great if some committer would update the svn:ignore property on the trunk (as an example camel-jclouds/target folder is considered as an outgoing-change on my IDE, or .classpath & .project by some other camel components). IMHO this would make life easier for the commiters (

Re: Camel CMIS component

2011-11-28 Thread bvahdat
Hi Bilgin, had a chance to look at your camel-cmis component (BTW another nice code of yours). I'm a newbie to JSR-283 and don't know much about it's API, however probably I'm going to be involved in a Sharepoint-Integration project and that would be really cool if I could just kick the Sharepoint

Re: [CLOSE][VOTE] Release Camel 2.8.3 (the second try)

2011-11-23 Thread bvahdat
O.K. I reflected my findings [1] regarding the manual issue I mentioned by this thread today and would appreciate any feedback/thoughts... [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3774 Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Camel-2-8-3-the-s

Re: [CLOSE][VOTE] Release Camel 2.8.3 (the second try)

2011-11-23 Thread bvahdat
O.K. just realized that the issue is already known: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4284 Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Camel-2-8-3-the-second-try-tp5002990p5016078.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nab

Re: [CLOSE][VOTE] Release Camel 2.8.3 (the second try)

2011-11-23 Thread bvahdat
Hi, downloading from a swiss mirror also worked for me, however looking at the html: doc/manual/camel-manual-2.8.3.html the content is: Download of http://camel.apache.org/book-in-one-page.html failed The ending tag is missing and I'm not sure if this body content was really "on purpose". S

Re: Unit test failure on trunk in camel-saxon

2011-11-23 Thread bvahdat
Great! now the referee on the Wiki [1] is also up-to-date as well. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Building (@ the line "You can also find some helpful notes on usage here." ) Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Unit-test-failure-on-tru

Re: Unit test failure on trunk in camel-saxon

2011-11-22 Thread bvahdat
Hi Jon, Thanks a lot for your commitment on this and bringing that behaviour back into the play. Other than this I've got another concern which I would really appreciate if you could take a look at: As you can see in [1] the links on your old blog entry seem to point to out-dated eclipse templat

Re: Unit test failure on trunk in camel-saxon

2011-11-22 Thread bvahdat
Hi looking at the build of this morning [1] the test failure issue is now fixed, however like Willem I think the pre-existing fail-fast behaviour should be brought back as it used to be there. This however would require another JIRA-Ticket than [2] having the corresponding description / goal. [1]

Re: Unit test failure on trunk in camel-saxon

2011-11-21 Thread bvahdat
So that by [1] I simply mimicked the same changes done on unit-tests by [2] [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4700 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4689 Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Unit-test-failure-on-trunk-in-camel-sax

Re: Unit test failure on trunk in camel-saxon

2011-11-21 Thread bvahdat
Hi Willem, completely agree on your proposal, and looking at the changes on the existing unit-tests by [1], that's [2] & [3] that "fail-fast" behaviour seems to be gone away. [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1202819&view=rev [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/camel/trunk/camel-core/src/test/jav

Re: Unit test failure on trunk in camel-saxon

2011-11-21 Thread bvahdat
Hi, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4700 Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Unit-test-failure-on-trunk-in-camel-saxon-tp5009713p5010536.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.9.0-RC1

2011-11-09 Thread bvahdat
So here is my word Claus asked for (I know it's too early, sorry for that): I gave a spin test with just only one of the apps of mine, and here my 2 cents: CamelTestSupport's context, template, consumer, etc. fields are *not* static anymore through the revision [1]. So using them in a static cont

Re: svn commit: r1170542 - in /camel/trunk: camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/api/ camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/api/management/ camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/component

2011-09-14 Thread bvahdat
Hi Claus, I also mentioned the issue here: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/svn-commit-r1170542-in-camel-trunk-camel-core-src-main-java-org-apache-camel-api-camel-core-src-main-tp4802422p4802513.html But for some reasons not clear to me, my mail didn't get accepted on the mailing list... Regar

Re: Compilation error on trunk on windows on Apache Jenkins

2011-09-13 Thread bvahdat
How stupid of me! Just realized that you've already kicked off a full test run by today... Sorry! -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Compilation-error-on-trunk-on-windows-on-Apache-Jenkins-tp4791051p4798522.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive

Re: Compilation error on trunk on windows on Apache Jenkins

2011-09-13 Thread bvahdat
Hi Claus, Unfortunately your last full test on windows missed the bug fix below which caused some tests on "camel-jms" & "camel-stream" to fail: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1169732 IMHO the newly introduced "retry up to 5 times logic" in TestSupport.deleteDirectory() doe

Re: Compilation error on trunk on windows on Apache Jenkins

2011-09-11 Thread bvahdat
Hi Claus, Having the following setup on my windows box, I couldn't reproduce the compliation error: c:\dev\workspace\camel>mvn --version Apache Maven 3.0.3 (r1075438; 2011-02-28 18:31:09+0100) Maven home: c:\dev\apache-maven-3.0.3\bin\.. Java version: 1.6.0_26, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc. Java

Re: [DISCUSS] - API stability in Camel 2.x

2011-09-06 Thread bvahdat
Hi All, the use-case Claus gave as an example in his last post indeed happened today morning with my client to whom I've provided the application (running stable since July 27th with camel 2.8.0 in the production). I wanted to give a try to the snapshot build of today morning at [1], and followin

Re: [HEADS UP] - Adjustments to ExecutorServiceManager on trunk

2011-08-19 Thread bvahdat
Like the one here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1159323 @Christian please don't blame me posting here as I simply couldn't stop myself commenting on this. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/HEADS-UP-Adjustments-to-ExecutorServiceManager-on-t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.8.0

2011-07-21 Thread bvahdat
Hi Claus, Sorry for my late response Am currently pretty busy Created the ticket and provided a patch for it. Actually I went one step forward regarding this issue to resolve it on other test cases as well. So please verify/check the delivered patch if it makes sense to you in all cases: https

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.8.0

2011-07-20 Thread bvahdat
Hi Claus, IMHO and with ALL my respect, I would never use the hard-coded unix-line-delimiter "\n", but would ALWAYS use the System.getProperty("line.separator"), so that I'm on the safe side no matter on which platform I'm running. That's "\r\n" on windows, "\n" on unix and "\r" on mac. The probl

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.8.0

2011-07-18 Thread bvahdat
There's only 2404 warnings left See the first 100 here: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/file/n4600069/warnings.jpeg warnings.jpeg . Just wonder if IDEA doesn't warn about these stuff, for example the raw type declaration of a given generic type Regards, Babak -- View this message in context

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.8.0

2011-07-16 Thread bvahdat
Got it! The problem with the TypeConverter by me was just a side effect of the following fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3974 So that the webservice-reply was simply not propagated into the exchange's out, The following diff says it all: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/file/n

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.8.0

2011-07-15 Thread bvahdat
[-1] as the TypeConverter/@Converter stuff doesn't work, even in a NON-OSGI environment, at least for me, see my comments here: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Some-indication-on-when-2-8-0-could-be-released-td4585340.html Just upgrading the maven dependency in my multi-module project from 2.7