The same for me.
Best,
Christian
Sent from a mobile device
Am 09.12.2011 12:34 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" :
> Hi
>
> I guess people may start to become a bit confused with this. I am a bit.
>
> Anyway I would like for Camel Karaf Shell to follow the same practice
> as Karaf itself.
> So whatever you
Hi
I guess people may start to become a bit confused with this. I am a bit.
Anyway I would like for Camel Karaf Shell to follow the same practice
as Karaf itself.
So whatever you guys do there, I think is fine for Camel.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Christian Schneider wrote
>
> karaf uses namings like:
> bundle:list
> service:list
>
> These are resource oriented what means that the scheme bundle references a
> resource type.
The are not exactly resource oriented, I would say the are "feature"
oriented.
Take
apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://wwx.talend.com
- Reply message -
From: "Christian Schneider"
To:
Subject: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Date: Thu, Dec 8, 2011 12:05 pm
The number of characters per command is the same.
Using tab can
>> Hi Christian,
>>>
>>> I would wait the subshells and let the commands as it is.
>>>
>>> My 2 cents ;)
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>> http:
ly message -
From: "Christian Schneider"
To:
Subject: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Date: Thu, Dec 8, 2011 12:05 pm
The number of characters per command is the same.
Using tab can save you from typing most characters in both styles.
So I think the focus
B
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://wwx.talend.com
>
> - Reply message -
> From: "Christian Schneider"
> To:
> Subject: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
> Date
Hi Claus,
karaf uses namings like:
bundle:list
service:list
These are resource oriented what means that the scheme bundle references
a resource type.
camel:route-list
is not resource oriented. camel references a framwork.
camel-route:list
would be more similar to karaf. Of course we can not
Hi
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Christian Schneider
wrote:
>
> I really like the idea of having camel:route and then simply call list or
> start or stop.
>
> We can even do that without the sub shells already by naming the commands
> slightly different.
>
> Instead
> camel:route-list
> camel:c
lign Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Date: Thu, Dec 8, 2011 12:05 pm
The number of characters per command is the same.
Using tab can save you from typing most characters in both styles.
So I think the focus on resources really makes the difference and I
think it is more natural to think in res
The number of characters per command is the same.
Using tab can save you from typing most characters in both styles.
So I think the focus on resources really makes the difference and I
think it is more natural to think in resources for humans than in commands.
Christian
Am 08.12.2011 10:38, s
Hi,
I prefer that we keep as command family name a short name. "camel" is
fine but "camel-route" or "camel-context" are too long. Imagine when
operating a project on a platform, the number of characters to be typed
on the keyboard. This has an impact which is not negligible.
So why not using
I really like the idea of having camel:route and then simply call list
or start or stop.
We can even do that without the sub shells already by naming the
commands slightly different.
Instead
camel:route-list
camel:context-list
I propose to have:
camel-route:list
camel-context:list
This wo
Thanks Claus.
I'm working on it today ;)
Regards
JB
On 12/06/2011 06:56 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
I created a ticket to track this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4746
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
+1
On Dec 5, 2011, at 1:50 AM, Christian Müller wrote:
Hi
I created a ticket to track this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4746
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
> +1
>
> On Dec 5, 2011, at 1:50 AM, Christian Müller wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Sent from a mobile device
>> Am 02.12.2011 16:30 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" :
>>
>>> Hi
+1
On Dec 5, 2011, at 1:50 AM, Christian Müller wrote:
> +1
>
> Sent from a mobile device
> Am 02.12.2011 16:30 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the
>> commands.
>>
>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-com
On 2 December 2011 15:29, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the commands.
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
>
> eg
> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
Or we could even go with route:l
+1
On 2 December 2011 15:57, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Claus,
>
> fully agree, and in fact, it's in my TODO list.
>
> If all are agree, I will do it :).
>
> I plan to commit Karaf sub-shell (on Karaf trunk) over the week end.
>
> What do you think to update Camel trunk to start to use sub-
+1
Sent from a mobile device
Am 02.12.2011 16:30 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" :
> Hi
>
> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the
> commands.
>
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
>
> eg
> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
+1
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Claus,
>
> fully agree, and in fact, it's in my TODO list.
>
> If all are agree, I will do it :).
>
> I plan to commit Karaf sub-shell (on Karaf trunk) over the week end.
>
> What do you think to update Camel trunk to start to us
Hi Claus,
fully agree, and in fact, it's in my TODO list.
If all are agree, I will do it :).
I plan to commit Karaf sub-shell (on Karaf trunk) over the week end.
What do you think to update Camel trunk to start to use sub-shell (maybe
it's better to wait that Camel 2.9.0 is out first) ?
Reg
Hi
On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the commands.
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
eg
camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
I think we should do the same for the Camel karaf commands.
--
Claus Ibsen
---
22 matches
Mail list logo
