Hi
Okay last hurdle on this one. All wiki is done now, phew.
See my comment on the JIRA ticket
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1475
Its the one about the JMS stuff added on april-13.
As I am in doubt whether the patch/idea is a good idea or not. Would
love more feedback.
On T
>
> Next step in improvement would be to handle that the
> PROPAGATION_REQUIRED bean is optional, so Camel can lookup and find
> the PlatformManager and default to required itself. Just like the JMS
> component can do with transacted=true URI option.
Okay I have added this feature now.
Camel will
Very cool. Nice work Claus!
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Latest progress now is that I have introduced the *transacted* DSL
> keyword in both Java DSL and Spring DSL.
> Its capable of auto lookup in the registry for the transaction policy
> so no need to wire it.
>
Hi
Latest progress now is that I have introduced the *transacted* DSL
keyword in both Java DSL and Spring DSL.
Its capable of auto lookup in the registry for the transaction policy
so no need to wire it.
For instance in this Spring XML
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Background is CAMEL-1475, however the ticket title is a bit misleading
>
> This morning I got Camel to be able to use transacted routes without
> you have to remember to configure a transactedErrorHandler.
> This makes it a bit easier to
Hi
Background is CAMEL-1475, however the ticket title is a bit misleading
This morning I got Camel to be able to use transacted routes without
you have to remember to configure a transactedErrorHandler.
This makes it a bit easier to use transacted routes in Camel.
So what you must do is use the
