Hi
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I logged a ticket to not forget about this.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5997
>
> Will work with Lukasz proposals to get this into the 2.11 codebase, so
> we have a baseline for better CDI and OSGi registry integrati
Hi
I logged a ticket to not forget about this.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5997
Will work with Lukasz proposals to get this into the 2.11 codebase, so
we have a baseline for better CDI and OSGi registry integration.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:
> Dear
I think that we need at least one more to be able to find interface
registered in OSGI registry but using the filter. In this class, we need
Class and filter
lookupByTypeAndFilter(Class type, String Filter)
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:51 PM,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Christian Müller
wrote:
> +1
> I'm fine with this changes. I'm only wondering what is the intention for
> "lookupByNameAndType"? Throwing an exception if the type is different? Or
> returning null? Or ...?
>
I also suggest cutting down on the number of methods. Cu
I suggest looking at the spring api for some sensible behaviours.
Den 22. nov. 2012 21:52 skrev "Christian Müller" <
christian.muel...@gmail.com> følgende:
>
> +1
> I'm fine with this changes. I'm only wondering what is the intention for
> "lookupByNameAndType"? Throwing an exception if the type is
+1
I'm fine with this changes. I'm only wondering what is the intention for
"lookupByNameAndType"? Throwing an exception if the type is different? Or
returning null? Or ...?
Best,
Christian
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:
> Dear all,
> During my work on camel-cdi componen
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Sounds good to me, not sure in what release it would make sense to make this
> change. One comment, there is no reason for lookupByNameAndType to not be
> called simply lookupByName (name override). The findByTypeWithName method
> name is a
Sounds good to me, not sure in what release it would make sense to make
this change. One comment, there is no reason for lookupByNameAndType to
not be called simply lookupByName (name override). The
findByTypeWithName method name is a bit ugly too, imho.
I'll think about it some more,
Hadrian
