We only support Karaf 4.x or newer.
So your PR is good and we would like to merge it.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Tomohisa Igarashi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just submitted a pull request for CAMEL-10124, migrating camel commands to
> karaf4 style. And found this thread is somehow related...
> http
Hi,
I just submitted a pull request for CAMEL-10124, migrating camel commands to
karaf4 style. And found this thread is somehow related...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10124
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1206
As far as I tested locally, current camel commands are working f
+1
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Andrea Cosentino <
ancosen1...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> I agree with Daniel.
>
> Anyway this is something we can surely work on for the next release.
> --
> Andrea Cosentino
> --
> Apache Camel PMC Member
> Apache Karaf Comm
+1
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Andrea Cosentino
wrote:
> I agree with Daniel.
>
> Anyway this is something we can surely work on for the next release.
> --
> Andrea Cosentino
> --
> Apache Camel PMC Member
> Apache Karaf Committer
> Apache Servicemix Committe
+1
---
Luca Burgazzoli
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Andrea Cosentino
wrote:
> I agree with Daniel.
>
> Anyway this is something we can surely work on for the next release.
> --
> Andrea Cosentino
> --
> Apache Camel PMC Member
> Apache Karaf Committer
> Apac
I agree with Daniel.
Anyway this is something we can surely work on for the next release.
--
Andrea Cosentino
--
Apache Camel PMC Member
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix Committer
Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com
Twitter: @oscerd2
Github: oscerd
On Friday,
+1
Regards
JB
On Sep 23, 2016, 07:15, at 07:15, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>I think it’s too late to do this for 2.18 (trying to get that out
>soon). Might make sense for 2.19.
>
>Dan
>
>
>> On Sep 23, 2016, at 4:21 AM, Guillaume Nodet
>wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to start a discussion around upgrading
I think it’s too late to do this for 2.18 (trying to get that out soon). Might
make sense for 2.19.
Dan
> On Sep 23, 2016, at 4:21 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> I'd like to start a discussion around upgrading Camel karaf support to
> Karaf 4.
> Karaf 4 has brought a number of changes that
I'd like to start a discussion around upgrading Camel karaf support to
Karaf 4.
Karaf 4 has brought a number of changes that could be leveraged :
* no strong dependency on blueprint
* complete feature validation at build time
* more fine grained feature so that all dependencies can be express
