ppalaga commented on issue #42: Use RestAssured in JDBC test
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/issues/42#issuecomment-509580310
> No one is saying that we should ban tests that do not use resteasy
Nice to hear that. My standpoint is that we should have one or more itests
ppalaga commented on issue #42: Use RestAssured in JDBC test
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/issues/42#issuecomment-509569867
I see at least two reasons why we might not want to do this:
1. Practical: adding resteasy bloats the native image a bit. Compilation
will take
