Re: [HEADS UP] Camel Web Site changes....

2012-03-10 Thread Christian Müller
Indeed I missed this mail. At this time I was in vacation and didn't remember it after my return... Best, Christian On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:31:17 PM Christian Müller wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > > > looks great! I also like that the new sit

Re: [HEADS UP] Camel Web Site changes....

2012-03-09 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Nice that you picked up this glove, and got started early in the year, so we wont have a last-minute issue when the year is closing. On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > As some of you are aware, the Apache Infrastructure team has mandated that > all projects move to the ne

Re: [HEADS UP] Camel Web Site changes....

2012-03-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:31:17 PM Christian Müller wrote: > Hi Dan, > > looks great! I also like that the new site passed the W3C validation and > that it renders the images of our blog posts much nicer. I will try it out > when it's online. > I didn't know that INFRA has mandated this move.

Re: [HEADS UP] Camel Web Site changes....

2012-03-08 Thread Christian Müller
Hi Dan, looks great! I also like that the new site passed the W3C validation and that it renders the images of our blog posts much nicer. I will try it out when it's online. I didn't know that INFRA has mandated this move. Are there some resources where I can read more about it? Thanks for the ti

Re: [HEADS UP] Camel Web Site changes....

2012-03-07 Thread Reuben Garrett
Impressive! I especially like that the HTML passes validation. Documentation is sometimes the "unsung hero" of a project, so I appreciate all your attention to it. Best regards, Reuben

[HEADS UP] Camel Web Site changes....

2012-03-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
As some of you are aware, the Apache Infrastructure team has mandated that all projects move to the new svnpubsub process for publishing their websites by the end of the year. Camel (as are all Confluence based sites) is affected by this mandate. We currently use a multi-step rsync process