Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-07-22 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 09/06/15 14:54, Christoph Emmersberger wrote: > Ok, ... so I'll run the release now off the old Google Code repositories. > > Can anybody cross check if I have the appropriate rights on the GitHub > repository to commit tags? I've given it quite a few shots and it still > won't let me prepare

Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-07-04 Thread Christoph Emmersberger
Hello Christian! Thanks for the update! / Christoph On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Christian Müller < christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Christoph! > > Once again, I encourage you (and all other Apache-Extra developers) to > subscribe to the Apache community development mailing list [

Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-07-04 Thread Christian Müller
Hello Christoph! Once again, I encourage you (and all other Apache-Extra developers) to subscribe to the Apache community development mailing list [1] and follow/discuss your opinions in the "Apache Extras, Google Code and Sourceforge" thread [3]. Unfortunately (my personal view), it looks like t

Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-06-30 Thread Christoph Emmersberger
Hi Christian As August is approaching, and Greg has already put some effort into migrating the project to GitHub, I'd like to reach out once again. Did you hear any official statement on how to proceed after August? I also heard some rumors that Google might be creating another hosting opportunit

Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-06-09 Thread Christoph Emmersberger
Ok, ... so I'll run the release now off the old Google Code repositories. Can anybody cross check if I have the appropriate rights on the GitHub repository to commit tags? I've given it quite a few shots and it still won't let me prepare the release from there. Just wanted to make sure we are in a

Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-04-28 Thread Henryk Konsek
Hi Pontus, For now, commit only to Google Code. Cheers. wt., 28.04.2015 o 09:05 użytkownik Pontus Ullgren napisał: > Pressed send a bit fast there sorry. > > I'm planning to have a look at CAMEX-61[1] today and it would be nice to > know where it should be committed. > > > [1] https://camel-ex

Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-04-28 Thread Pontus Ullgren
Pressed send a bit fast there sorry. I'm planning to have a look at CAMEX-61[1] today and it would be nice to know where it should be committed. [1] https://camel-extra.atlassian.net/browse/CAMEX-61 On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 at 09:00 Pontus Ullgren wrote: > Think I already voted in another thread b

Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-04-27 Thread Willem Jiang
Github is more popular now days, +1 for moving camel-extra to Github. -- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. Web: http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On April 27, 2015 at 2:13:01 AM, Christian Müll

Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-04-26 Thread Christian Müller
+1 Same from me. Best, Christian Am 26.04.2015 17:25 schrieb "Christoph Emmersberger" : > All > > even if I know that google code will be writable until August, I'd prefer > having only one place to go. > > In the past, I've reached out to ASF asking for a migration to Github. They > mentioned th

Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-04-26 Thread Christoph Emmersberger
All even if I know that google code will be writable until August, I'd prefer having only one place to go. In the past, I've reached out to ASF asking for a migration to Github. They mentioned the same SourceForge cooperations, but it turned out that they are only used for downloading binary arti

Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-04-17 Thread Henryk Konsek
Oh, the static stuff... Thanks for pointing this, Christian. I guess I have to give some love to camel-extra releases again then :) . Cheers. pt., 17 kwi 2015 o 00:16 użytkownik Christian Müller < christian.muel...@gmail.com> napisał: > No, we cannot as discussed here [1]. > > [1] > http://camel

Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-04-16 Thread Christian Müller
No, we cannot as discussed here [1]. [1] http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Licence-camel-raspberrypi-td5765076.html Best, Christian - Software Integration Specialist Apache Member V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Camel committer Apache Incubator PMC Member

Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-04-16 Thread Henryk Konsek
Hi Greg, camel-raspberrypi can be included in ASF Camel. It has Apache friendly license. BTW I'm waiting for your responses to my pull request comments ;) . Cheers. czw., 16 kwi 2015 o 21:36 użytkownik Christian Müller < christian.muel...@gmail.com> napisał: > -1 at this time. > > Google Code i

Re: [PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-04-16 Thread Christian Müller
-1 at this time. Google Code is writable until 24th August 2015. There is no need to rush with this decision [1]. As mentioned before by others, there is an ongoing discussion at Apache ComDev [2] where to move with the Apache Extras project. Please follow/join this discussion. Camel Extras is a p

[PROPOSAL] camel-extra moves forward

2015-04-15 Thread Greg Autric
Hi All, I reactivate camel-extra project. Migration to GitHub is finished. But I would like your point of view / help about several things : - Drop camel-extra version 2.14 - Release ASAP camel-extra version 2.15.x - Develop now for 2.16 including camel-raspberrypi component. - looking for someo