Henryk, it's a legal issue and an important one. It is not arbitrary
that ASF projects cannot use xGPL. And believe it or not, the vast
majority of companies I interacted with do care if it's permissive
licenses or like BSD or MIT or ALv2 or something much more restrictive
like GPL or other lic
Hello Henryk!
Please find my comments inline...
Best,
Christian
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Henryk Konsek wrote:
> > I assume that the outcome of the discussion at [1] will be we cannot use
> > the Apache mailing list for mail notifications from Apache Extra / Camel
> > Extra.
> > I'm no
> I assume that the outcome of the discussion at [1] will be we cannot use
> the Apache mailing list for mail notifications from Apache Extra / Camel
> Extra.
> I'm not sure what the outcome will be for the documentation, we already
> have in the Apache Confluence WIKI for Camel Extra components. M
I assume that the outcome of the discussion at [1] will be we cannot use
the Apache mailing list for mail notifications from Apache Extra / Camel
Extra. But the discussion is still in progress and I will wait for a final
decision (which should be documented somewhere). However, we could also
create
I fail to follow the reasoning. There are plenty of camel components
hosted by other open source projects, various individual github users
and even by commercial companies.
What does project governance have to do with anything? Bonus question:
is your expectation that Apache Camel would be a o
You can follow the discussion here [1].
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201209.mbox/%3CCALvzYd-h4Q=cteggqcneeninhvose8uigt2gtk22n9cmr_k...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Best,
Christian
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:29 PM, James Carman wrote:
> There is some discussion about this, tho
There is some discussion about this, though. We aren't sure if it's
the "hosting" or the "management" of the code that is the sticking
point. The hosting is definitely out, but merely using an external
source control system and all the other infrastructure/management
services here at the ASF migh
+1 if we can unify the wiki and issue for Camel and Camel-Extra.
The reason which we setup the Camel-Extra project is we cannot host the code of
GPL license in Apache.
I don't think we cannot add the document or issues into Apache Camel due to
that kind of issue.
Any thoughts?
On Wednesday, S
> - Using Apache JIRA for Camel extra
For now, I'll keep Camel Extra issues in Google Issue tracker. We
shouldn't have Camel Extra issues spread around two places. However it
will be nice if eventually we could use Jira for that.
> (- Using Issue notifications on iss...@camel.apache.org for issue
This is what I want to figure out with the people on the right mailing list:
- Using Apache JIRA for Camel extra
(- Using Issue notifications on iss...@camel.apache.org for issues raised
in Camel extra)
- Using Commit notifications on comm...@camel.apache.org for changes in
Camel extra
- Using the
> Until this is not settled, I don't
> want to change this. MAY BE we cannot use the the official Apache JIRA to
> track issues at Apache extra...
Ok guys, probably I don't get some nuances of the Apache politics.
>From this point of view some issues (like CAMEL-5382[1]) are illegal
and should not
-1
Yes it would be nice/convenient. However, camel-extra is an external
project. AFAIK, the ASF is not providing hosting services for external
projects.
Hadrian
On 09/24/2012 05:12 PM, Henryk Konsek wrote:
+1 if we make it simple and easy for our Camel extra users to find the
Apache Camel
Hi Henryk!
Do you follow the other discussion [1]? Until this is not settled, I don't
want to change this. MAY BE we cannot use the the official Apache JIRA to
track issues at Apache extra...
[1]
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Re-Apache-Extras-notifications-was-Disable-GitHub-commenting-httpd-
> +1 if we make it simple and easy for our Camel extra users to find the
> Apache Camel JIRA.
Anybody else wants to express their opinion? If not, can we assume it
is a quiet consensus?
--
Henryk Konsek
http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com
I think a [DISCUSS] subject would have been better than a [VOTE], but
however...
+1 if we make it simple and easy for our Camel extra users to find the
Apache Camel JIRA.
Best,
Christian
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Henryk Konsek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While working on the camel-extra stuff tog
Hi,
While working on the camel-extra stuff together with Christian, I've
risen the proposal of removing the 'Issues' tab [1] from the Camel
extra page. Instead of Google Issues tracker, we could put the
information on the Camel Extra home page, telling that one should use
Camel Jira [2] to report
16 matches
Mail list logo
