[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

Thanks for your participation in the vote for Camel 2.19.0. This vote passes with the following results: +1 binding: 4 (Babak Vahdat, Claus Ibsen, Gregor Zurowski, Luca Burgazzoli) +1 non-bindung: 7 (Gary Brown, Krzysztof Sobkowiak, Nicola Ferraro, Onder Sezgin, Preben Asmussen, Thomas Diesler,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

+1 (binding) Gregor On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is the second vote to release Apache Camel 2.19.0, a new minor > release with over 670 new features, improvements and bug fixes. A > summary of the changes is available in the Camel wiki [1]. T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

Hi Everyone: I will wait a little bit longer for any further feedback, and if we don't get any blockers until tomorrow, I will release 2.19.0. Thanks, Gregor On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is the second vote to release Apache Camel 2.19.0, a new

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

+1 (binding) Just gave a shot using the CiA 2nd edition codebase. Other than couple of failed ones below all the tests ran successfully: [INFO] Camel in Action 2 :: Chapter 9 :: Test using Pax Exam FAILURE [ 19.738 s] [INFO] Camel in Action 2 :: Chapter 9 :: Test using WildFly FAILURE [ 1.846 s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

+1 (binding) On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Can we get any other binding votes from committers or PMC members for > this release? > > Thanks, > Gregor > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Gregor Zurowski > wrote: >> Hi Everyone: >> >> This is the second vote to release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

+1 (non-binding) Kindly regards Krzysztof On 30.04.2017 17:32, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is the second vote to release Apache Camel 2.19.0, a new minor > release with over 670 new features, improvements and bug fixes. A > summary of the changes is available in the Camel wiki

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

Can we get any other binding votes from committers or PMC members for this release? Thanks, Gregor On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is the second vote to release Apache Camel 2.19.0, a new minor > release with over 670 new features, improvements and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

+1 (personal projects) On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 at 18:33, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is the second vote to release Apache Camel 2.19.0, a new minor > release with over 670 new features, improvements and bug fixes. A > summary of the changes is available in the Camel wiki [1]. Th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Marco Collovati wrote: > Ok, sorry. > Oh dont be, we value all feedback. What you have discovered is likely something we can improve for the next release. You are welcome to dive in the source code, and and we love contributions. PRs is welcome http://camel.apache.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

Ok, sorry. BTW, aside from my previous problem, I tested RC on some production project involving camel-jms, camel-cxf, camel-mail and camel-api-component-maven-plugin and all is working fine. On 02/05/2017 20:39, Claus Ibsen wrote: Hi Marco You should likely post a new thread with more det

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

Hi Marco You should likely post a new thread with more details what you are trying to do. Your use-case is not normal and therefore not considering a blocker. There are likely other places where such check in doStart is checking the field also. The RC testing is more focusing on existing applicat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

Hi Some of the examples are deprecated and are not of priority. And we should likely remove then in the following release. Such as CDI on OSGi. Also I think we should reduce our number of OSGi examples as they keep becoming stale and broken from time to time, and some of them are very old and not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

+1 Tested the PubNub component /Preben -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-19-0-Attempt-2-tp5798533p5798567.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

Hi, I'm running through camel examples in the tarball for sanity check. I hit 'image not found' error on 2 kubernates examples though, I guess it's just missing a few steps to let it recognize the staging repo? Anyway I'll continue on remaining. karaf commands don't install on 4.0.7, so

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

+1 (non-binding) Nicola On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Luca Burgazzoli wrote: > +1 (binding) > > --- > Luca Burgazzoli > > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Zoran Regvart wrote: > > +1 > > > > I've run integration tests for the Salesforce component against those > artifacts > > > > zoran > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

+1 (binding) --- Luca Burgazzoli On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Zoran Regvart wrote: > +1 > > I've run integration tests for the Salesforce component against those > artifacts > > zoran > -- > Zoran Regvart

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

+1 I've run integration tests for the Salesforce component against those artifacts zoran -- Zoran Regvart

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

+1 (non binding) - tested the opentracing component. - Original Message - > Hi Everyone: > > This is the second vote to release Apache Camel 2.19.0, a new minor > release with over 670 new features, improvements and bug fixes. A > summary of the changes is available in the Camel wiki [1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

+1 > On 1. May 2017, at 13:38, Marco Collovati wrote: > > -1 > > Got an issue with DefaultComponent change on doStart method: > the check for camel context is done via getter > ```ObjectHelper.notNull(getCamelContext(), "camelContext");``` > but the following logic access the `camelContext` fie

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

-1 Got an issue with DefaultComponent change on doStart method: the check for camel context is done via getter ```ObjectHelper.notNull(getCamelContext(), "camelContext");``` but the following logic access the `camelContext` field directly. This leads to NPE when extending DefaultComponent as a d

[VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2)

Hi Everyone: This is the second vote to release Apache Camel 2.19.0, a new minor release with over 670 new features, improvements and bug fixes. A summary of the changes is available in the Camel wiki [1]. The first vote was cancelled due to multiple issues found while testing the first release

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

This vote is cancelled due to various issues found in the release candidate. I am currently preparing a new release candidate for Camel 2.19.0 and will send out another vote e-mail soon. Thanks, Gregor On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

Hi Gregor Yes you are welcome to go ahead. Thanks a lot for doing this. On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > Just wanted to check with you regarding the status of your changes. > Do you already have all your changes in the master branch that need to > go i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

Hi Gregor, I've pushed the last of the Salesforce component fixes I wanted to do to master, thank you for your work :) zoran On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Just wanted to check with you regarding the status of your changes. > Do you already have all your changes in th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

Hi Gregor The opentracing changes are in master. Regards Gary - Original Message - > Hi Everyone: > > Just wanted to check with you regarding the status of your changes. > Do you already have all your changes in the master branch that need to > go into 2.19.0? > > Thanks, > Gregor > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

Hi Everyone: Just wanted to check with you regarding the status of your changes. Do you already have all your changes in the master branch that need to go into 2.19.0? Thanks, Gregor On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Gregor Zurowski > wrot

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

+1 (personal projects) On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 at 14:11, Claus Ibsen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Gregor Zurowski > wrote: > > I can start creating the new release candidate on Saturday, if that > > works for everyone. > > > > +1 > > That is a good time, then people have today and tom

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > I can start creating the new release candidate on Saturday, if that > works for everyone. > +1 That is a good time, then people have today and tomorrow to get last things into the master branch. And as always please help test the curren

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

I can start creating the new release candidate on Saturday, if that works for everyone. Gregor On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Gregor Zurowski > wrote: >> Hi Claus, >> >> Not a problem - I can take care of creating a new release candidate

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Any thoughts from the +1 voters whom may be okay with a delay due to a > new RC needs to be cut? OK with me, I'm looking at a new Salesforce-Ping check issue that can be included also do we want to time box the re-cutting? zoran -- Zoran R

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

+1, it's better to have these commit in the new release -- Andrea Cosentino -- Apache Camel PMC Member Apache Karaf Committer Apache Servicemix PMC Member Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com Twitter: @oscerd2 Github: oscerd On Thursday, April 27, 2017 11:47 AM, Claus

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Claus, > > Not a problem - I can take care of creating a new release candidate, > if we decide that we have too many issues with the current one. > Thanks that is good to know. There has been a fair amount of commits since the RC (say

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

Hi Claus, Not a problem - I can take care of creating a new release candidate, if we decide that we have too many issues with the current one. Thanks, Gregor On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > I gave the RC a test with the source code for Camel in Action 2nd ed > and it all

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

I gave the RC a test with the source code for Camel in Action 2nd ed and it all passed. There was a known issue with pax-exam which should not be related to this RC but I would need to re-check to be really sure. On the flip side we do have found a few issues and also the JPA bug that was fixed i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

+1 (binding) Regards JB On Apr 26, 2017, 19:03, at 19:03, Luca Burgazzoli wrote: >+1 > >--- >Luca Burgazzoli > > >On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Gary Brown wrote: >> If there is another build, would appreciate if CAMEL-11198 fix could >be included. >> >> Regards >> Gary >> >> - Original M

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

+1 --- Luca Burgazzoli On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Gary Brown wrote: > If there is another build, would appreciate if CAMEL-11198 fix could be > included. > > Regards > Gary > > - Original Message - >> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Nicola Ferraro wrote: >> > -1 (non-binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

If there is another build, would appreciate if CAMEL-11198 fix could be included. Regards Gary - Original Message - > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Nicola Ferraro wrote: > > -1 (non-binding) > > > > Found an issue with the new camel-reactive-streams component in spring-boot > > defau

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

+1 from wildfly-camel > On 25. Apr 2017, at 21:50, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.19.0, a new minor release > with over 670 new features, improvements and bug fixes. A summary of > the chan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

+1 Tested the PubNub component, and added it to the release notes. /Preben -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-19-0-tp5798264p5798331.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

Hi Gregor, Cameleers, +1 The integration tests for the Salesforce component against those artifacts are OK Other than that I've run into two smaller issues with regards to the ping check component verifier CAMEL-11202[1] and CAMEL-11203[2], but I don't think that should hold the release as this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

+1 (binding) Tested against personal project. By the way lets discuss about the camel-reactive-streams issue. -- Andrea Cosentino -- Apache Camel PMC Member Apache Karaf Committer Apache Servicemix PMC Member Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com Twitter: @oscerd2 Github

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Nicola Ferraro wrote: > -1 (non-binding) > > Found an issue with the new camel-reactive-streams component in spring-boot > default config (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-11201), that > prevents application startup. > If we decide to do another build, I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

-1 (non-binding) Found an issue with the new camel-reactive-streams component in spring-boot default config (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-11201), that prevents application startup. If we decide to do another build, I'll include the fix in the 2.19.x branch. Nicola On Wed, Apr 26

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

No that is fine. Thanks. - Original Message - > Hi Gary, > > The opentracing component is already listed. Do you miss any specific > information regarding this component? > > Thanks, > Gregor > > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Gary Brown wrote: > > Hi > > > > Can the opentracing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

Hi Gary, The opentracing component is already listed. Do you miss any specific information regarding this component? Thanks, Gregor On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Gary Brown wrote: > Hi > > Can the opentracing component also be added to the wiki? > > Thanks. > > Regards > Gary > > - Ori

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

Ok thanks - Original Message - > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > > Its there already > > > > btw I added a link to camel-opentracing to the docs in github so users > can find that easily from the release note > > > And people should be look at the docs from github

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Its there already > btw I added a link to camel-opentracing to the docs in github so users can find that easily from the release note > And people should be look at the docs from github > https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

Its there already And people should be look at the docs from github https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components#components .. it has links to every JAR On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Gary Brown wrote: > Hi > > Can the opentracing component also be added to the wiki? > > Thanks. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

Hi Can the opentracing component also be added to the wiki? Thanks. Regards Gary - Original Message - > Hi > > Gregor I think we updated that wiki page at more or less the same time. > > New components should be added in the section that says - new > component, and not in the top, so

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

Hi Gregor I think we updated that wiki page at more or less the same time. New components should be added in the section that says - new component, and not in the top, so I moved them down there. On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Dmitry Volodin wrote: > Hi Gregor! > > Please also add following n

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

Hi Gregor! Please also add following new components to the wiki page: camel-olingo4 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-11056) camel-grpc (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-11107) -- Best regards, Dmitry 2017-04-25 22:50 GMT+03:00 Gregor Zurowski : > Hi Everyone: > > This is

[VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0

Hi Everyone: This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.19.0, a new minor release with over 670 new features, improvements and bug fixes. A summary of the changes is available in the Camel wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Camel+2.19+Release. Release notes: https://issues.ap