Hi
So the PR from Tomo was a bit overwhealming.
I have talked with Tomo to do this in smaller steps so we can all
follow where this is taking Camel.
At first step is something like
- type awareness to route level (similar to rest-dsl binding)
- example in xml
- example in java
- this feature is
Hi,
I filed a JIRA for this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10447
and added a camel-example-transformer with some bug fixes:
https://github.com/igarashitm/camel/tree/CAMEL-10447
https://github.com/igarashitm/camel/commit/1c9bb6d8f23e0d96e942161f8ffc821845d99c59#diff-02f2b5457a96
Hi Claus,
Thanks for the feedback!
On 10/26/2016 09:39 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Tomohisa Igarashi
wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to resume the discussion about this. I still think 3.0 would be the
best target to get this feature fully supported, but to achieve it in bette
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Tomohisa Igarashi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to resume the discussion about this. I still think 3.0 would be the
> best target to get this feature fully supported, but to achieve it in better
> shape, I'd like to have it in 2.19 as well as an experimental, ask feedb
:51
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding type awareness in Camel route
Hi,
On 10/17/2016 03:32 PM, Siano, Stephan wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure if I really understand the concept behind this. Is there any text
about the general ideas behind these changes?
Good question, here is the original
probably
very hard to implement.
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: Tomohisa Igarashi [mailto:tm.igara...@gmail.com]
Sent: Montag, 17. Oktober 2016 16:51
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding type awareness in Camel route
Hi,
On 10/17/2016 03:32 PM, Siano, Stephan
bitrary
processors!
Does it make sense?
Thanks,
Tomo
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: Tomohisa Igarashi [mailto:tm.igara...@gmail.com]
Sent: Montag, 17. Oktober 2016 04:36
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding type awareness in Camel route
Hi,
I'd like to resume the di
point types or are you just focusing
some special processors that operate on very specific data?
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: Tomohisa Igarashi [mailto:tm.igara...@gmail.com]
Sent: Montag, 17. Oktober 2016 04:36
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding type awarene
Hi,
I'd like to resume the discussion about this. I still think 3.0 would be the
best target to get this feature fully supported, but to achieve it in better
shape, I'd like to have it in 2.19 as well as an experimental, ask feedback and
then reflect those for 3.0 full support. Fortunately thi
Hi Claus,
Thanks for the reply. Sure that's fine, I agree 3.0 would be better to be
targeted than 2.x as this introduces some schema updates.
Including this one, I'm always looking for the chance to make any contribution
to Camel. If there's anything I can help please let me know.
Thanks,
Tom
Hey
Can we take this discussion post Camel 2.18 release.
We are working on the last details to get it ready, and its our main
focus to get this new release out.
After this release we will pickup talks about the next releases
whether that is 2.19 or 3.0, and for the latter what the broad goals
of
Hi Camel developers,
I'd like to propose an enhancement on handling data types of Camel message
contents. To start a smooth discussion I implemented the idea first:
https://github.com/igarashitm/camel/tree/contract-based-type-awareness
And these testcases demonstrates the declarative transforme
12 matches
Mail list logo
