it failed.
>
> Do you think Camel is a good framework for this kind of use cases.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Subbu.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Best-
> Practice-to-write-Processor-tp5756514p5757163.html
> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
will be able to process the request from where it failed.
Do you think Camel is a good framework for this kind of use cases.
Thanks & Regards,
Subbu.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Best-Practice-to-write-Processor-tp5756514p5757163.html
Sent from the C
gt; View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Best-Practice-to-write-Processor-tp5756514p5756884.html
>
> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
using
camel processor as a function.
If we use camel processor as a function what is the implication. Does it add
to the performance?
Thanks & Warm Regards,
Subbu.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Best-Practice-to-write-Processor-tp5756514p5756884.html
nd it over to a business delegate, which then taken returns the final
> response to be send to the GUI.
>
> Thanks & Warm Regards,
> Subbu.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Best-Practice-to-write-Processor-tp5756514.html
> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Does anyone have an answer. Please reply it will be very helpful.
Thanks & Regards,
Subbu.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Best-Practice-to-write-Processor-tp5756514p5756554.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
to be send to the GUI.
Thanks & Warm Regards,
Subbu.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Best-Practice-to-write-Processor-tp5756514.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.