On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:22 PM, James Strachan
wrote:
> Cool - I was gonna suggest putting some of the adapter classes into
> the SPI package as a place for folks extending Camel to put things? No
> biggie though, seems the issue is resolved now.
Yeah they are in util now. Not the best "home" I
Cool - I was gonna suggest putting some of the adapter classes into
the SPI package as a place for folks extending Camel to put things? No
biggie though, seems the issue is resolved now.
2009/3/8 Claus Ibsen :
> Hi
>
> I fixed the package tangle so we keep the current package structure as is.
>
>
Hi
I fixed the package tangle so we keep the current package structure as is.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am using Structure 101 to view the Camel API and have found some hot
> spots to clear.
> - DataFormatType was implementing DataFormat (fixed)
> - SPI had a
Hi
I am using Structure 101 to view the Camel API and have found some hot
spots to clear.
- DataFormatType was implementing DataFormat (fixed)
- SPI had a bad tangle (fixed)
- Language had a bad tangle (fixed)
However we do have some support classes (abstract base classes) in
camel.impl that are
