text;
}
{code}
and added the following jars from ${WebSphere_MQ_HOME}/java/lib:
- com.ibm.mq.jar
- com.ibm.mq.jmqi.jar
- com.ibm.mqjms.jar
- dhbcore.jar
Christian
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-InOut-Performance-Issues-with-Correlation-Mechanis
-Performance-Issues-with-Correlation-Mechanism-tp489714p3356722.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Marat, did solve this your performance issue? Or what do you mean?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-InOut-Performance-Issues-with-Correlation-Mechanism-tp489714p3356692.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
code and post the results, if I find something
> interesting...
>
> Christian
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-InOut-Performance-Issues-with-Correlation-Mechanism-tp489714p3356574.html
> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
code and post the results, if I find something
interesting...
Christian
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-InOut-Performance-Issues-with-Correlation-Mechanism-tp489714p3356574.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
it. Keep you
> posted...
>
> Cheers,
> Christian
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-InOut-Performance-Issues-with-Correlation-Mechanism-tp489714p3356523.html
> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive
Hello Olivier!
My collegues report the same problem. I will have a look into it. Keep you
posted...
Cheers,
Christian
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-InOut-Performance-Issues-with-Correlation-Mechanism-tp489714p3356523.html
Sent from the Camel
;s processInOut method and are
>> using an additional JmsTemplate to do this timed receive for a single
>> reply
>> after submitting the request and it works well and much faster for both
>> EMS
>> and MQ (we also don't need temporary destinations).
>>
>&g
ed temporary destinations).
>
> We do think that the camel-jms component should provide this reply
> correlation mechanism in the context of the calling thread out of the box
> and are hence suggesting this as a future enhancement. What do you think?
>
> Regards,
> Oliver D
in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-InOut-Performance-Issues-with-Correlation-Mechanism-tp27405612p27405612.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
10 matches
Mail list logo