On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 2:49 PM Gregor Zurowski
wrote:
>
> Yes, it makes sense. I would suggest we put something about this on our
> website so that users are aware of this.
>
Yeah lets include this details in the 3.1 release notes and also
create a separate news blog about the EOL and suggested
Yes, it makes sense. I would suggest we put something about this on our
website so that users are aware of this.
Thanks,
Gregor
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 5:22 PM Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> When Camel 3.1.0 is GA I would actually like to EOL 3.0.x quickly.
>
> This release has some flaws like exce
I'm +1 on this. We have some fixes on camel-3.0.x, so maybe we could have a
little patch release and then stop.
Il giorno lun 24 feb 2020 alle ore 17:22 Claus Ibsen
ha scritto:
> Hi
>
> When Camel 3.1.0 is GA I would actually like to EOL 3.0.x quickly.
>
> This release has some flaws like excess
Hi
When Camel 3.1.0 is GA I would actually like to EOL 3.0.x quickly.
This release has some flaws like excessive object allocations and a
memory leak in recipient list / toD under certain conditions, among
others things.
The 3.1.0 is really a much better release and we should encourage
3.0.x use
