Re: Potential bug in convertBodyTo

2018-02-18 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Yeah from the git history and the source code it seems like we should restore the old one after the conversion. You are welcome to log a JIRA and provide a PR On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Quinn Stevenson wrote: > I found a situation where Camel isn’t doing what I expected, and I wanted to

Re: Potential bug in convertBodyTo

2018-02-15 Thread Quinn Stevenson
Hmmm…. I would expect that if the character set was already on the exchange before the call, it should still be there after the call - that is the issue I hit - it was removing the CamelCharsetName exchange property that was already there. If the charset is specified on the convertBodyTo, I th

Re: Potential bug in convertBodyTo

2018-02-15 Thread Alex Dettinger
I would not say that it's a bug. Actually, when convertBodyTo ends up decoding bytes to string, I would expect the charset to be removed. When convertBodyTo ends up encoding a string into bytes, I would expect the charset to be overridden (I don't think that it is the current implementation however

Potential bug in convertBodyTo

2018-02-15 Thread Quinn Stevenson
I found a situation where Camel isn’t doing what I expected, and I wanted to ask the developers before I created the JIRA and changed the behavior that I believe is a bug. What I’m seeing is when I call convertBodyTo with a both type and a character set supplied and the exchange already has a c