Re: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue..

2016-07-14 Thread James Carman
want to dispatch your reply messages to different > endpoints without selectory? > > -Original Message- > From: James Carman [mailto:ja...@carmanconsulting.com] > Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juli 2016 13:11 > To: dev@camel.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo

RE: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue..

2016-07-13 Thread Siano, Stephan
mes Carman [mailto:ja...@carmanconsulting.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juli 2016 13:11 To: dev@camel.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue.. Shared uses selectors. There's no reason to use selectors in my case On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 6:31 AM Siano, Stephan wrote: &

Re: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue..

2016-07-13 Thread James Carman
gt; wrong here? > > -Original Message- > From: James Carman [mailto:ja...@carmanconsulting.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 12. Juli 2016 15:47 > To: dev@camel.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue.. > > I am not talking about using a Shared reply queue. I'm

RE: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue..

2016-07-13 Thread Siano, Stephan
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue.. I am not talking about using a Shared reply queue. I'm talking about using Exclusive. The idea would be to be able to send messages, using a ProducerTemplate or something, like this: jms:queue:foo?replyToType=Exclusive&replyT

Re: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue..

2016-07-12 Thread James Carman
I am not talking about using a Shared reply queue. I'm talking about using Exclusive. The idea would be to be able to send messages, using a ProducerTemplate or something, like this: jms:queue:foo?replyToType=Exclusive&replyTo=REPLIES&concurrentConsumers=5 jms:queue:bar?replyToType=Exclusive&rep

RE: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue..

2016-07-11 Thread Siano, Stephan
Hi James, I am not sure whether I understand the context. Are you talking about request/reply over JMS with the camel-jms component? In that case the replyToDestinationSelectorName parameter might help you with shared reply to queues. I actually do not see any impact that may have on transacti