Thanks for the pointer.
-Original Message-
From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 19. Juli 2016 13:08
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers
Just edit the release notes at
http://camel.apache.org/camel-2180-release.html
You are welcome to create a
Hi Claus,
>
> How do I provide input for the 2.18 release notes?
>
> Best regards
> Stephan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Juli 2016 11:56
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers
Hi Claus,
How do I provide input for the 2.18 release notes?
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 19. Juli 2016 11:56
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers
Hi
Sounds good.
Javadoc is good for documenting
That can be done in GIthub too. Since that supports.
-Original Message-
From: Bharath Kumar Champalal
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 3:39 PM
To: dev
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers
That would be gr8.
Can we have Doxygen as an option
They support Markdown, which looks nice
That would be gr8.
Can we have Doxygen as an option
They support Markdown, which looks nice.
-Original Message-
From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 3:26 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers
Hi
Sounds good.
Javadoc is good for
Original Message-
> From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 15. Juli 2016 12:14
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers
>
> Hi
>
> Thanks for bringing this up to attention.
> I read your proposals and very good with the pros
list. Anything
else I have forgotten?
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
Sent: Freitag, 15. Juli 2016 12:14
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers
Hi
Thanks for bringing this up to attention.
I read your proposals and very good
Hi
Thanks for bringing this up to attention.
I read your proposals and very good with the pros/cons of them.
Yeah I also think its better to go with #3 so we get a better solution
for this which we carry forward for Camel 3, and have @deprecated the
old api on 2.x.
+1 for option #3.
On Mon,
Hi,
Unfortunately I have received no feedback about this so far.
If nobody objects I will go on with the implementation for option 3 and check
that into the master branch sometime next week.
If anybody here has doubts about this please speak up!
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
