Hi Dan
Thanks for the correction.
Unfortunatly git at Apache has more pages if you search, and you often
end up at that old git svn page
And not at that new page you posted.
For Camel committers read this page first:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Daniel Kulp
Also note:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
has a lot of information to help get you started.
Dan
On May 6, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I don't think we are all set.
>> There is confusing of the *correct* url to b
On May 6, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I don't think we are all set.
> There is confusing of the *correct* url to be used.
>
> IMHO the url should be as listed here
> http://git.apache.org/
No, those are the read-only mirrors from the svn repo.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org
Hi
I don't think we are all set.
There is confusing of the *correct* url to be used.
IMHO the url should be as listed here
http://git.apache.org/
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Christian Müller
wrote:
> Hadrian, you are welcome to announce it.
>
> Christian
>
> Sent from a mobile device
> Am
Hadrian, you are welcome to announce it.
Christian
Sent from a mobile device
Am 06.05.2013 19:18 schrieb "Hadrian Zbarcea" :
> All set. We are officially running on git now. Please shout if you
> experience any issues. Christian, do you want to announce it on the main
> site or you want me to? W
All set. We are officially running on git now. Please shout if you
experience any issues. Christian, do you want to announce it on the main
site or you want me to? We need to start updating the site, I'll do it
in the evening if no one beasts me to it.
Cheers
Hadrian
On 05/06/2013 11:33 AM,
I added a comment to the INFRA jira, we should be back in business
shortly. Thanks for everybody's patience.
Hadrian
On 05/06/2013 09:47 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
Cloned nicely. (And danged fast).
On May 6, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Christian Müller
wrote:
The Git repository looks good to me too (
Cloned nicely. (And danged fast).
On May 6, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Christian Müller
wrote:
> The Git repository looks good to me too (master, branches, tags).
>
> I tried to update our CI builds to use our new Git repository, but I got an
> exception. There is also no explanation at https://git-wip
The Git repository looks good to me too (master, branches, tags).
I tried to update our CI builds to use our new Git repository, but I got an
exception. There is also no explanation at https://git-wip-us.apache.org.
Could someone try whether he has more luck than me...
Best,
Christian
On Mon, M
Thanks Jon. Could we please get another nod?
Hadrian
On 05/06/2013 07:24 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
Git repo at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git looks good to
me.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recomm
Git repo at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git looks good to
me.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
> infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My full test
> over the
The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My full
test over the weekend failed, but the problem was with our tests. After
completing the migration there are a few changes necessary for
supporting the releas
Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if infra asks
for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
Cheers,
Hadrian
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197
On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
Had
Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
Hadrian
On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
Hi Hadrian!
Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
Best,
Christian
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Would that something that sounds appealin
Hi Hadrian!
Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
Best,
Christian
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
+1 for moving to git.
For the svn maven repo, I just have a quick look the artifacts, I don't think
we need them any more.
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willem
Inline.
Hadrian
On 03/28/2013 09:35 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:26 AM, Christian Müller
wrote:
Hadrian, it looks like your timing is better than my one [1] ;-)
In general, I'm +1 to switch to Git (I use git-svn at Camel since I can
remember...).
It's not clear for me righ
On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:26 AM, Christian Müller
wrote:
> Hadrian, it looks like your timing is better than my one [1] ;-)
>
> In general, I'm +1 to switch to Git (I use git-svn at Camel since I can
> remember...).
>
> It's not clear for me right now what we have to do with the projects which
>
sounds good
On 27 Mar 2013, at 20:01, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>
> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as much
> as I
Hadrian, it looks like your timing is better than my one [1] ;-)
In general, I'm +1 to switch to Git (I use git-svn at Camel since I can
remember...).
It's not clear for me right now what we have to do with the projects which
are not located under trunk [2] - [6]. I don't think we need all of the
+1
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> +1.
>
> Raúl.
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Henryk Konsek wrote:
>
> > > Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> > > already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
> >
> >
+1.
Raúl.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Henryk Konsek wrote:
> > Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> > already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>
> +1 for ASF, +1 for Extra
>
> --
> Henryk Konsek
> http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.
> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
+1 for ASF, +1 for Extra
--
Henryk Konsek
http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com
Yeah, sounds fine. That would eliminate the sometimes annoying delay
between svn and git mirror.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
+1
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Chris Geer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea
> wrote:
>
> > Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> > already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
> >
>
> +1
>
> >
> > Same questi
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>
+1
>
> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as
> much as I di
26 matches
Mail list logo
