Hello Dan!
Thanks for your contribution. I like it...
Best,
Christian
Sent from a mobile device
I just fixed a few minor grammatical things and added more into the "who"
section.
Dan
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 9:25:03 PM Christian Müller wrote:
> Today, I had some time to work on it and update [1].
> Please review this change and feel free to update/ask/discuss the changes
> you do no
Today, I had some time to work on it and update [1].
Please review this change and feel free to update/ask/discuss the changes
you do not understand/agree with/...
I hope we reached consensus here.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Merging+commits+from+trunk+to+fixes+branch
B
It sounds good,
Thanks Christian
Regards
JB
On 11/12/2011 07:29 AM, Christian Müller wrote:
I will put these things together and put it into our WIKI in the next few
days. Feel free to comment, if you disagree with a point and didn't raise
your voice until now.
Best,
Christian
--
Jean-Bapt
I will put these things together and put it into our WIKI in the next few
days. Feel free to comment, if you disagree with a point and didn't raise
your voice until now.
Best,
Christian
Figured I should respond to this important email... though maybe we have
lazy consensus on the topic? ;)
I think in general this makes a lot of sense and really, we are following
most of this right now anyways. And of course, these are not hard and fast
rules and we can always DISCUSS later for sp
May it was not the best idea to call this thread "[DISCUSS] Rules for
Backports". What I had in mind was more like "[DISCUSS] Guidelines for
Backports". Also my *NO* for some backports seems to be strong, but not for
all...
Because we had a few discussions/questions in the last weeks about some
bac
