I just retested this, and the EXCEPTION_CAUGHT property is NOT on the exchange
sent to onCompletion.onFailureOnly element.
So my last question is - can I do something in the SyncronizationAdapter so
that the onException elements will get triggered?
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Quinn Stevenso
Thanks for the quick reply Claus -
I always use the hasOut() to figure out what message to work with in my
processors - I’m not sure why I missed it here the first time around. I was a
little surprised about the out message being there (since I don’t explicitly
use one) - I thought I’d read th
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Quinn Stevenson
wrote:
> I made some progress with this.
>
> In my SynchronizationAdapter, I had been calling
> exchange.getIn().setHeader(…) - I’d never looked to see if there was an “out”
> message. Once I changed this to set the header on the out message, the
I made some progress with this.
In my SynchronizationAdapter, I had been calling exchange.getIn().setHeader(…)
- I’d never looked to see if there was an “out” message. Once I changed this
to set the header on the out message, the headers started showing up where I
wanted them.
Now I’m down
I’m struggling with this, and I can’t seem to get what I’m after.
I added a SynchronizationAdapter (via addOnCompletion), but the exchange passed
to the onComplete portion of the route still doesn’t have the headers I’m
setting in the Syncronizationadapter. I’ve tried setting the header in both
There is an addOnCompletion on the exchange you can use. Then your
onCompletion can implement that interface, or extend
SynchronizationAdapter
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Quinn Stevenson
wrote:
> Thank you for the prompt reply :-)
>
> This sounds like exactly what I need, but I’m a little unc
Thank you for the prompt reply :-)
This sounds like exactly what I need, but I’m a little unclear about how to
implement it. I tried creating a UnitOfWork, adding a Synchronization, and
then setting the UnitOfWork on the exchange when I create it, but my
Synchronization isn’t getting called.
If you talk about UoW completions with Synchronization:
org.apache.camel.spi.Synchronization
Then you can implement Ordered, and then set the value to be HIGHEST
so this one is run before the others.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Quinn Stevenson
wrote:
> I would like to enhance the camel-mllp
