On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Christian Müller
> wrote:
>> It would be great to improve the Aggregator to support a completion size
>> which evaluates ALL exchanges (from all different aggregates).
>> We ofter have the requirement to split a
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Charles Moulliard wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> What you suggest is really interesting and could be added to the existing
> aggregator if we add some properties and global cache to inform the
> aggregator that it will receive exchanges from different input. But the
> q
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Christian Müller
wrote:
> It would be great to improve the Aggregator to support a completion size
> which evaluates ALL exchanges (from all different aggregates).
> We ofter have the requirement to split a file which contains items which we
> process independently
Hi Christian,
What you suggest is really interesting and could be added to the existing
aggregator if we add some properties and global cache to inform the
aggregator that it will receive exchanges from different input. But the
question is "Is it still the role of the aggregator of doing that inst
