Re: Suggestions for new set of integration pattern symbols

Thanks for the feedback @whiskey ! Not quite sure what you mean about the /need to ‘describe/name/reference’ major ‘conditions or logic predicates’ on message handling inside the box/ Is this the kind of thing you have in mind:

Re: Suggestions for new set of integration pattern symbols

I like the version 3 and 4 (with the nice round idea of the six version), as there is always a need to name the box, so an outline is more often quite mandatory. The original lib (visio and omnigraffle) could benefit from a nice ‘design refresh’. One missing point however in using those blocks in

Re: Suggestions for new set of integration pattern symbols

This post contains an offer to contribute towards the diagrams symbolizing the Camel patters, with 6 different suggested formats -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Suggestions-for-new-set-of-integration-pattern-symbols-tp5789901p5789932.html Sent from the Camel