Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-12 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:27 PM, bvahdat wrote: > Hi Claus, > >> Thanks Dan. >> The  svn ignore is not back to normal for IDEA users. > > just because of my curiosity. Does it work now for you or do you still have > the same problem? > Ah sorry that was a typo. It works fine now. > Babak > > -

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-12 Thread bvahdat
Hi Claus, > Thanks Dan. > The svn ignore is not back to normal for IDEA users. just because of my curiosity. Does it work now for you or do you still have the same problem? Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/The-big-svn-ignore-commit-tp5044135p5067974.h

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-07 Thread bvahdat
Claus, Not sure if [1] is really related but just for any case. However I see your point: it used to work before that script run so that you expect it to still work *even* after that run. My apologies beforehand as I was the guilty one who started discussing [2] this. [1] http://youtrack.jetbrai

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-06 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Monday, December 05, 2011 7:50:52 AM bvahdat wrote: >> Your second script-run beforehand today seems still to be O.K. on >> eclipse/subclipse for me (0 outgoing-changes), hope it'll be the same for >> the IDEA users as well. > Thanks Dan. Th

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-05 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Monday, December 05, 2011 7:50:52 AM bvahdat wrote: > Your second script-run beforehand today seems still to be O.K. on > eclipse/subclipse for me (0 outgoing-changes), hope it'll be the same for > the IDEA users as well. I'm seeing some derby.log files left around, but that's not a bad thing r

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-05 Thread bvahdat
Your second script-run beforehand today seems still to be O.K. on eclipse/subclipse for me (0 outgoing-changes), hope it'll be the same for the IDEA users as well. Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/The-big-svn-ignore-commit-tp5044135p5049254.html Sent from

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Saturday, December 03, 2011 8:36:49 AM Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > Unfortunately the big svn:ignore commit made it worse. Now all the > IDEA files is not ignored. > > ? components/camel-ahc/camel-ahc.ipr > ? components/camel-ahc/camel-ahc.iml > ? components/camel-ahc/camel-ah

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-03 Thread bvahdat
Hi, For me the issue on eclipse was actually already resolved through your svn:ignore commit on the trunk even before this commit, see [1]. Completely another point: IMHO I assume because of the same regular expression inspiration by svn, we used to have the issue [2] caused by maven. I think the

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Yeah, just tested, it works directly in svn:ignore :) Regards JB On 12/03/2011 09:16 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi Claus, AFAIR, *.i?? is valid for git, but doesn't work for svn (you can use *.ipr, *.iws). Maybe it's now possible with

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-03 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Claus, > > AFAIR, > > *.i?? is valid for git, but doesn't work for svn (you can use *.ipr, *.iws). > Maybe it's now possible with latest svn version. > We used *.i?? before, so I guess it works with svn. My laptop has this version:

Re: The big svn:ignore commit

2011-12-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Claus, AFAIR, *.i?? is valid for git, but doesn't work for svn (you can use *.ipr, *.iws). Maybe it's now possible with latest svn version. Regards JB On 12/03/2011 08:36 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: Hi Unfortunately the big svn:ignore commit made it worse. Now all the IDEA files is not ignor