I've been working on a Docker project some months ago.
These are different images for different java versions. Default image Oracle
Java 7 based.
https://github.com/oscerd/docker-java
--
Andrea Cosentino
--
Apache Camel Committer
Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com
T
Thank you, I'll take a look at it.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:52 AM, David Karlsen
wrote:
> Oracle java can be installed through a ppa repo like this:
> https://github.com/davidkarlsen/docker-java
>
> 2015-07-22 5:07 GMT+02:00 Mark Webb :
>
> > While it does not explicitly state on the page:
>
Oracle java can be installed through a ppa repo like this:
https://github.com/davidkarlsen/docker-java
2015-07-22 5:07 GMT+02:00 Mark Webb :
> While it does not explicitly state on the page:
>
> http://camel.apache.org/building.html
>
> Are all the Camel release builders using Oracle Java? This
Hi
No I dont think that its a requirement, its just what people often
have installed and used for building.
I think open jdk should be able to build also.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Mark Webb wrote:
> While it does not explicitly state on the page:
>
> http://camel.apache.org/building.htm
While it does not explicitly state on the page:
http://camel.apache.org/building.html
Are all the Camel release builders using Oracle Java? This may make
creating a Docker image using Oracle Java a little tricky.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Andrew Block wrote:
> +1 for Docker Hub. It
+1 for Docker Hub. It will allow for automated builds from a Git source and is
the default registry for Docker users
--
Andrew Block
On July 21, 2015 at 9:02:40 AM, Andrea Cosentino
(ancosen1...@yahoo.com.invalid) wrote:
I think there is no problem using dockerhub.
Andrea
Inviato da Yahoo
I think there is no problem using dockerhub.
Andrea
Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android
Da:"Mark Webb"
Data:mar, 21 lug, 2015 alle 15:56
Oggetto:Re: Using docker for Camel CI/CD
I plan on using Docker Hub (hub.docker.com) to store any images that I
create. Does this sound OK. I don't expect an
I plan on using Docker Hub (hub.docker.com) to store any images that I
create. Does this sound OK. I don't expect any issues with licensing..etc.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Mark Webb wrote:
> Dan,
>
> I agree with you 100%. I will add this to the list.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
>
> On Mon,
Dan,
I agree with you 100%. I will add this to the list.
Thanks,
Mark
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> My main requirement would be that docker images for any of the below
> actions are there for convenience for developers that may want to use them,
> but should not be R
My main requirement would be that docker images for any of the below actions
are there for convenience for developers that may want to use them, but should
not be REQUIRED for any of those actions. For those of us that have release
environments already setup using the normal “release:prepare/
10 matches
Mail list logo