thanks for the feedback guys, created the following ticket and will add
support soon:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6119
-
Ben O'Day
IT Consultant -http://consulting-notes.com
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/aggregator-force-completion-with
A third option would be to create an option in the aggregator. A bit more
work, but cleaner IMHO.
Sent while on the move.
On 2 Mar 2013 06:58, "Claus Ibsen" wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yeah that may seem like a good idea. But you cannot change the current
> behavior (break stuff for people). So I suggest to
Hi
Yeah that may seem like a good idea. But you cannot change the current
behavior (break stuff for people). So I suggest to add that 2nd header
so you can say its inclusive.
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:35 AM, boday wrote:
> currently its implemented to only look for a header
> (Exchange.AGGREGAT
