Re: git commit: upgrade fop 1.0 to 1.1

2013-10-18 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Yeah Karaf is a bit more tricky, as just because the feature file validates succesful, and the features can be installed one by one in Karaf, does not mean that they actually work. We do have a bunch of integration tests in camel-itest-osgi but not for every components. So in this case camel-

Re: git commit: upgrade fop 1.0 to 1.1

2013-10-18 Thread Christian Müller
Thanks Claus, I wasn't aware of this issue. May I overlooked the JIRA? Best, Christian - Software Integration Specialist Apache Member V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Camel committer Apache Incubator PMC Member https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller

Re: git commit: upgrade fop 1.0 to 1.1

2013-10-18 Thread Cristiano Costantini
It is good to avoid minor dependency updates in Camel micro releases, and this should be kept as true as possible especially with main dependencies, but with the big fauna of dependencies of the project it is best to have flexibility over this rule to avoid paralysis :-) A better commit message ho

Re: git commit: upgrade fop 1.0 to 1.1

2013-10-17 Thread Claus Ibsen
camel-fop doesnt work in karaf without this upgrade. On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Christian Müller wrote: > I thought we agreed to not do minor dependency updates in Camel micro > releases. > > Best, > Christian > Am 17.10.2013 09:29 schrieb : > >> Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/camel-2.

Re: git commit: upgrade fop 1.0 to 1.1

2013-10-17 Thread Christian Müller
I thought we agreed to not do minor dependency updates in Camel micro releases. Best, Christian Am 17.10.2013 09:29 schrieb : > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/camel-2.12.x 6eea01095 -> faff7402f > > > upgrade fop 1.0 to 1.1 > > > Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/repo > Comm