On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 7:55 AM Otavio Rodolfo Piske
wrote:
>
> Although I do have some concerns of
> appropriateness of some code that now lies in Camel K runtime, I think it's
> a matter of adjusting them to be more generic or moving them up or down to
> Camel Core or Camel K as needed.
Sure, t
Hi Claudio,
I think the approach is fine. I also agree the change to Camel Quarkus can
make things easier for Camel K. Although I do have some concerns of
appropriateness of some code that now lies in Camel K runtime, I think it's
a matter of adjusting them to be more generic or moving them up or
Hi
+1
Yes this would be really good.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 3:17 PM Claudio Miranda
wrote:
> Hi, camel-k-runtime project was created to have several camel
> components (and the related quarkus extensions) suitable for Camel K,
> however all camel components are already into camel, and only th
