Re: Undertow uri syntax

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Nicola Ferraro wrote: > +1 to the idea of swapping http components using configuration (as long > term solution). > Personally, I'd prefer writing "https://www.google.com;, rather than > "http4s://www.google.com", or

Re: Undertow uri syntax

+1 to the idea of swapping http components using configuration (as long term solution). Personally, I'd prefer writing "https://www.google.com;, rather than "http4s://www.google.com", or "undertow://www.google.com?scheme=https"... Speaking of undertow, I have also this one: CAMEL-10565.. 1 io

Re: Undertow uri syntax

Hi Also it would be good to make it easy to configure the connection timeout on the undertow producer. It should ideally be a option: connectionTimeout you can set on the endpoint and/or component. On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > And

Re: Undertow uri syntax

Hi And speaking of undertow there is also this one which would be nice to make possible https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-11046 On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Luca Burgazzoli wrote: > Great ! > > I would be really nice if we can swap http component without

Re: Undertow uri syntax

Great ! I would be really nice if we can swap http component without much changes, for service call + spring-boot this would be lovely as one can swap the component via spring's properties and no code change. --- Luca Burgazzoli On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Zoran Regvart

Re: Undertow uri syntax

Hi Yeah that would be great. There is a ticket about aligning undertow with camel-http-common and Zoran started working on that a while back. If that is too much work we could add a temporary improvement so camel-undertow can default to use http scheme if omitted. On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:33

Re: Undertow uri syntax

Hi Luca, yes, I think that would be a good idea. IMHO all HTTP components should behave similarly, this helps users to migrate between them as they see fit. We should probably push as much of the code into camel-http-common where it makes sense, zoran On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Luca

Undertow uri syntax

Hello, I've recently worked on some examples related to the service-call eip using undertow as underlying component to see how complex is to go beyond the defaults and it worked nice, the only downside is that you cannot simply swap the component as undertow expect also the protocol (http/https)