Re: Web site -> svn migration questions...

2012-03-13 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 08:38:21 PM Christian Müller wrote: > We have to decide between a version which only contains options which are > available in this version but we miss a few *OR* a version which contains > all available options but also list options which are only available in > newer ve

Re: Web site -> svn migration questions...

2012-03-13 Thread Christian Müller
We have to decide between a version which only contains options which are available in this version but we miss a few *OR* a version which contains all available options but also list options which are only available in newer versions (but describes this). I'm +1 for the second option. And as long

Re: Web site -> svn migration questions...

2012-03-12 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > Just a quick question, does the web site still have the kits of the old > version of Camel? > > I don't think we need to keep the old version of maven artifacts. If the > people need to find the old version of camel java doc, he could download

Re: Web site -> svn migration questions...

2012-03-12 Thread Willem Jiang
Just a quick question, does the web site still have the kits of the old version of Camel? I don't think we need to keep the old version of maven artifacts. If the people need to find the old version of camel java doc, he could download it from central maven. On 3/13/12 5:03 AM, Daniel Kulp w

Re: Web site -> svn migration questions...

2012-03-12 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Monday, March 12, 2012 09:51:33 PM Christian Müller wrote: > > 1) The manual/ dir currently has a bunch of manuals all the way back to > > camel 1.2: > > camel-manual-1.2.0.pdf camel-manual-1.6.0.pdf camel-manual-2.0.0.pdf > > camel-manual-2.5.0.pdf camel-manual-2.8.4.pdf camel-manual-1.3.0.pdf

Re: Web site -> svn migration questions...

2012-03-12 Thread Christian Müller
Hello Dan! Please find my comments inline in your mail. Best, Christian On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > We now have the svn "space" setup for the website and I'm going to start > populating it with the content. You'll likely see some rather big commits > shortly to do

Re: Web site -> svn migration questions...

2012-03-12 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
I would only keep the manual for the minor version. A patch release should not introduce any significant changes for a particular branch, yet the manual is likely to have a large number of unrelated changes coming from newer minor releases. As such it's mostly confusing. I would also only keep

Web site -> svn migration questions...

2012-03-12 Thread Daniel Kulp
We now have the svn "space" setup for the website and I'm going to start populating it with the content. You'll likely see some rather big commits shortly to do that. However, I have a couple questions related to "old content": 1) The manual/ dir currently has a bunch of manuals all the wa