Hi
That sounds like a fine use-case.
+1
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Zoran Regvart wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>
>> But is there something about creating URI is expensive? I vaguely
>> recall something about creating either that or URL that may do some
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
> But is there something about creating URI is expensive? I vaguely
> recall something about creating either that or URL that may do some
> hostname lookup or something.
java.net.URL is the evil blocking one it blocks in hashCode on DNS
loo
Hi
That kind is fine. You should avoid using Object. As long as the from
-> to are specific types and not open ended like Object. The latter
requests to use a fallback type converter and some more "tricky" code
to do this correctly.
But is there something about creating URI is expensive? I vaguel
Hi Claus,
thanks for reviewing :) Would this be better?
CharSequence toCharSequence(URI value)
and
URI toUri(CharSequence value)
or do you think that URI type converter support should be removed entirely?
zoran
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:2
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:21 PM, wrote:
> Repository: camel
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master c6a15565a -> d569b80d8
>
>
> CAMEL-10915 Add type conversion support for jav...
>
> ...a.net.URI
>
> Adds converter to and from `java.net.URI` and `java.lang.CharSequence`.
>
>
> Project: http://
