Re: git commit: Upgrade to leveldbjni 1.8

2013-10-19 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi The old 1.7 version is actually wrong in its pom.xml file. If you take a note you can see the native drivers are the older 1.5 version which is totally wrong. org.fusesource.leveldbjni:leveldbjni-linux32:jar:1.5:compile The intent is also these native drivers has scope provided. So you as an

Re: git commit: Upgrade to leveldbjni 1.8

2013-10-18 Thread Johan Edstrom
Would this have gone in had it been a regular git hub project? That's really the only question you need to ask yourself, right? Sent from my pressure cooker. On Oct 18, 2013, at 18:25, Christian Müller wrote: > I'm sure you know the project much better than me, but if you have a look > at the d

Re: git commit: Upgrade to leveldbjni 1.8

2013-10-18 Thread Christian Müller
I'm sure you know the project much better than me, but if you have a look at the dependency tree for camel-leveldb 2.12.1: [INFO] org.apache.camel:camel-leveldb:bundle:2.12.1 ... [INFO] +- org.fusesource.leveldbjni:leveldbjni-all:jar:1.7:compile [INFO] | +- org.fusesource.leveldbjni:leveldbjni-os

Re: git commit: Upgrade to leveldbjni 1.8

2013-10-18 Thread Claus Ibsen
Not every project has 3 digits for their versions. Some have only 2. And these projects may do bug fix releases where upgrading is safe/compatible. So when a 2 digit project does a release, then it can be a bug fix release like leveldb 1.7 to 1.8 is. For example you can try http://vdiff.notsoclev

Re: git commit: Upgrade to leveldbjni 1.8

2013-10-18 Thread Christian Müller
Is this minor dependency upgrade in a Camel micro release also because of an issue with Leveldb in Camel 2.12.1? Do we have an issue for this? Best, Christian - Software Integration Specialist Apache Member V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Camel committer Apa