n the logs
Body:BigEndianHeapChannelBuffer(ridx=0, widx=768, cap=768)
FYI: sending the 1024 syslog message over netty looks to work fine
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/syslog-RFC-5424-dataformat-component-tp5015386p5040205.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing li
Sounds good to me. I'm just above novice when it comes to Camel, but I've
got some cycles, how do you want to proceed?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/syslog-RFC-5424-dataformat-component-tp5015386p5039198.html
Sent from the Camel Development ma
to proceed?
>>
>> It'd also be nice to handle the structured data un/marshal with a map or
>> something. Perhaps a property on the SyslogMessage object?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.co
; View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/syslog-RFC-5424-dataformat-component-tp5015386p5018448.html
> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
How would you like to proceed?
It'd also be nice to handle the structured data un/marshal with a map or
something. Perhaps a property on the SyslogMessage object?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/syslog-RFC-5424-dataformat-component-tp5015386p5018448
omeway the
user could select the appropriate version. It'd be nice to handle both
RFC's with one component.
Is there best practice you can suggest here?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/syslog-RFC-5424-dataformat-component-tp5015386p5016770.html
S
pretty much copy and extend the existing
>> syslog implementation.
>>
>> Questions
>> 1) I'm open to contributing this, do you guys want this if it uses syslog4j
>> under the covers?
>> 2) If so, what should it be called? syslog2?
>>
>> Cheers
data.
>
> If we enhance the existing syslog component, it'd require some someway the
> user could select the appropriate version. It'd be nice to handle both
> RFC's with one component.
>
> Is there best practice you can suggest here?
>
>
>
> --
&
omponent, it'd require some someway the
user could select the appropriate version. It'd be nice to handle both
RFC's with one component.
Is there best practice you can suggest here?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/syslog-RFC-5424-dataforma
should it be called? syslog2?
Cheers,
Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/syslog-RFC-5424-dataformat-component-tp5015386p5015386.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Willem
--
buting this, do you guys want this if it uses syslog4j
under the covers?
2) If so, what should it be called? syslog2?
Cheers,
Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/syslog-RFC-5424-dataformat-component-tp5015386p5015386.html
Sent from the Camel Development maili
11 matches
Mail list logo