Re: [Discussion]Gson version problem

2019-12-08 Thread Akash Nilugal
Hi likun, Actually in datamap schema i havent seen classname, we always write the provider name so i think its not failing and the table Schema im not sure, it basically depends on which class loads first. Regards, Akash On 2019/12/09 04:20:07, Jacky Li wrote: > Hi Akash, > > > I check the

Re: [DISCUSSION] Cache Pre Priming

2019-12-08 Thread Ajantha Bhat
+1 Thanks, Ajantha On Fri, 6 Dec, 2019, 8:38 pm Akash Nilugal, wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > Akash R Nilugal > > On 2019/11/26 13:47:11, vikramahuja1001 > wrote: > > Hi Community! > > The support for prepriming in the case of Bloom and Lucene have to be > > removed from the design document as tho

Re: [Discussion]Gson version problem

2019-12-08 Thread Jacky Li
Hi Akash, I check the "alternate" annotation is already used in DataMapSchema line 56, and TableSchema line 70. So I wondering how this can work in hadoop cluster earlier? Regards, Jacky -- Sent from: http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/

gson dependency problem

2019-12-08 Thread Jacky Li
Hi Akash, Currently in master branch, we have introduce "alternate" from gson 2.4 to make table status file smaller, and I got message from you that gson 2.4 is conflicting with the gson 2.2.4 dependency in hadoop-common, so there is failure in hadoop cluster scenario. However, I check the "alter