Hi,
I agree with Ravi, first we need to come up with solution how to store till
nano/mico second in carbon. Then changing the formatter will be useful for
us.
Regards
Kumar Vishal
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 6:18 PM, Ravindra Pesala
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it is bigger than just changing to DateTim
Hi,
I think it is bigger than just changing to DateTimeFormatter. As of now,
carbon uses only 64 bit to store timestamp so it can accommodate till
milliseconds. In order to support till nanoseconds, we need to use 96
bits. If you check spark-parquet it uses 96 bits to store timestamp. It
would be
