Thank you for your inputs.
I have handled the comments and updated the document accordingly.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 9:31 AM Kunal Kapoor
wrote:
> Hi Shreelekhya,
> +1 for this feature,
>
> I could not understand how you would be able to handle compatibility, for
> the old tables the SQL
Hi Shreelekhya,
+1 for the feature. It was pending for a long time, thanks for working on
it.
I have added comments in the doc, please check
Regards,
Akash R Nilugal
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 9:31 AM Kunal Kapoor
wrote:
> Hi Shreelekhya,
> +1 for this feature,
>
> I could not understand how
Hi Shreelekhya,
+1 for this feature,
I could not understand how you would be able to handle compatibility, for
the old tables the SQL doesn't have to be rewritten, while for new tables
it has to be. So how will you decide this?
Same scenario for old table load
Also, Need to benchmark the impact
Hello Shreelekhya,
Please find the comments inline in the design document link shared.
Regards,
Indhumathi M
On 2022/03/17 16:09:10 Shreelekhya Gampa wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Currently, MV in carbon is supported as incremental or full refresh load
> based on the type of query. Whenever MV is
