http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/About-ColumnGroup-feature-tp14436p14729.html
Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list archive
at Nabble.com.
not a feature beneficial to real-world application, vote for A!
Jihong
-Original Message-
From: Jacky Li [mailto:jacky.li...@qq.com]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2017 6:05 PM
To: dev@carbondata.apache.org
Subject: About ColumnGroup feature
Hi Community,
In JIRA 1014, we are adding Unsafe
-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/About-ColumnGroup-feature-tp14436p14459.html
Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list archive
at Nabble.com.
Hi
+1 for removal ColumnGroup. it would be helpful to simplify the current
system code.
Regards
Liang
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/About-ColumnGroup-feature-tp14436p14458.html
Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev
Hi,
+1 for A (removal of Column group feature.)
Column group is anyway was not tuned well and it needs lot of effort to get
the good performance. And it is also unused feature in community as far as
I know. It becomes bottle neck to add new features on carbon data. So it is
better to remove the un
Hi Community,
In JIRA 1014, we are adding Unsafe ColumnPage in data load process to reduce
GC, and adding EncodingStrategy for Encoding Overriding features to make open
up encoding interface for both usability and extensibility.
When implementing these new features, I found ColumnGroup feature
