Sure, lets do one more release
+1
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:58 AM, manish gupta
wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards
> Manish Gupta
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Kumar Vishal
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > -Regards
> > Kumar Vishal
> >
> > On Mar 27, 2017 09:31, "xm_zzc" <441586...@qq.com> wrote:
> >
> > > H
Awesome work, JB!
Many thanks to drive the graduation steps.
- Henry
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Liang,
>
> We are now good. I will update pull requests and Jira issues count.
>
> I'm updating the maturity doc on the wiki and then I will start the
> discuss
DISCLAIMER file exits
LICENSE file looks good
NOTICE file look good
Artifacts has incubating tag
No executables binaries in source artifacts
Can compile from source
+1 (binding)
- Henry
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Liang Big data
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> PPMC vote for the release Apache CarbonD
I totally missed this. I will vet and reply to general@ list.
I apologize about missing the release VOTE
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit the CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating to your vote.
>
> Release Notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/R
Removing private@ from list.
Hi Liang,
Thanks for the release plan. Looking forward to it.
Just small reminder that let's not do cross posting to dev@ and private@
at the same time, bc we could accidentally post messages for private@ to
dev@ list.
- Henry
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Lian
Ok, if no objection I will ask INFRA to help makes the notification change
for option 2 plus new list issues@
Thanks!
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:57 PM, praveen adlakha
wrote:
> +1 for option 2.
>
> On Aug 20, 2016 8:22 AM, "Ravindra Pesala" wrote:
>
> > +1 for option 2 (Henry proposed solution)
RAT check seems to pass if you have 2 license headers.
More important question is that, does CarbonData team copy some classes and
interfaces defintions from other projects like OpenCV [1] ?
It is ASF license, but I am wondering why you need to copy instead of just
OpenCV declaration instead?
-
LICENSE file looks good
DISCLAIMER file exists
NOTICE file looks good
Checksum files look good
Sig file looks good
No 3rd party exes in the source artifacts.
License header exist
+1 (Binding)
- Henry
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the PPMC vote to re
Thanks for the update, JB.
Could you share INFRA ticket, if any, so we could follow along.
- Henry
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as you might have seen, master branch version is now
> 0.2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.
>
> I created the branch-0.1 branch wh
AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Henry,
>
> Agreed.
>
> it's what we are using in Apache Karaf, Beam, Flink, ...
>
> I think it's very convenient.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 08/18/2016 08:43 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
>
>> How about mo
How about modification of Option 2:
Issue Created, send mails to dev@carbondata.incubator.apache.org
Issue Created and all other JIRA events send mails to new mailing list at
iss...@carbondata.incubator.apache.org
- Henry
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Liang Big data
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Pl
This is great stuff, thanks for taking stab at it, JB.
I would reccommend we add tool in the source code to help committers merge
PRs.
Some projects like Apache Spark [1] and Apache Flink have simple script to
help automate the process.
We could adopt the script to do similar thing for CarbonData
12 matches
Mail list logo