Hi,
Still haven't heard from anyone about this, while the restart helped
temporarily, it now seems to be broken again. I restarted one node
with TRACE logging on, and I see this
INFO [GMFD:1] 2010-05-26 23:44:44,260 GossipDigestSynMessage.java (line 129)
Breaking out to respect the MTU
Hi,
I noticed yesterday I have lots of these messages
INFO [GMFD:1] 2010-05-25 23:21:04,070 GossipDigestSynMessage.java (line 152)
Remaining bytes zero. Stopping deserialization in EndPointState.
INFO [GMFD:1] 2010-05-25 23:21:05,224 GossipDigestSynMessage.java (line 129)
Breaking out
+1
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> As promised, here is the 0.6.2 vote.
>
> The list of changes from 0.6.1 is longer than I'd have liked, so it
> would be great if everyone can give this one an extra-special once over.
> Don't be afraid to drop a veto if you spot any regre
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:06 -0500, Stu Hood wrote:
> Should we have release notes for this release somewhere? NEWS.txt
> doesn't have an 0.6.2 section.
News might be a misnomer here, that file is for release notes, (i.e.
things you should be aware of when upgrading, new features, etc).
Considering
It looks like we've evolved into a pattern of documenting major
releases in NEWS.txt and bug-fixes in CHANGES.txt.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:06, Stu Hood wrote:
> +0
>
> Should we have release notes for this release somewhere? NEWS.txt doesn't
> have an 0.6.2 section.
>
> -Original Message-
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:34 +0100, ant elder wrote:
> Note that the distros are still including the old incubator
> DISCLAIMER.txt file that could be removed now
It's been removed in SVN; it won't be in the next release.
Thanks ant!
--
Eric Evans
eev...@rackspace.com
+0
Should we have release notes for this release somewhere? NEWS.txt doesn't have
an 0.6.2 section.
-Original Message-
From: "Gary Dusbabek"
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 7:50am
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 0.6.2
+1
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 16:02, Eric Evans
+1
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 16:02, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> As promised, here is the 0.6.2 vote.
>
> The list of changes from 0.6.1 is longer than I'd have liked, so it
> would be great if everyone can give this one an extra-special once over.
> Don't be afraid to drop a veto if you spot any regressi
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> As promised, here is the 0.6.2 vote.
>
> The list of changes from 0.6.1 is longer than I'd have liked, so it
> would be great if everyone can give this one an extra-special once over.
> Don't be afraid to drop a veto if you spot any regressio
