On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote:
To have things moving, I propose we aim for calling the vote on a first beta
release at the end of next week (say next Thursday for instance).
I worry that if the issue management is moved from the main JIRA for C*
sponsored drivers there will be synergy and awareness lost between client
and server. Did the Hector and Pelops folks see it as a good thing to have
their own?
As a small convenience to the Maven inclined among us, perhaps it
It may be prudent to have someone to accept responsibility for each of the
official drivers in Extras. This way we could have a single ticket (perhaps
with sub-tickets for each driver) to ensure drivers are brought up to date
for each release.
This would be less about polluting the C* JIRA with
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Nick Telford nick.telf...@gmail.com wrote:
It may be prudent to have someone to accept responsibility for each of the
official drivers in Extras. This way we could have a single ticket (perhaps
with sub-tickets for each driver) to ensure drivers are brought up to
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote:
On the 1.0 housekeeping business, I've created two new svn branches:
* 1.0.0: this is what will be ultimately released as the 1.0 final
* 1.0: this is for stuff that don't made the freeze but should go in
1.0.1.
