Hi,
I'm new to Cassandra and felt like exploring and hacking on the code. I
was surprised to see the usage of so many mutable/global state statics
all over the service package (basically global variables/singletons).
While I understand it can be practical to work with singletons, and that
in any
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Simon Chemouil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to Cassandra and felt like exploring and hacking on the code. I
> was surprised to see the usage of so many mutable/global state statics
> all over the service package (basically global variables/singletons).
>
> While I unde
Relevant: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6881
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Simon Chemouil
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm new to Cassandra and felt like exploring and hacking on the code. I
> > was surprised to see the
Interesting proposition. We¹ve embedded Cassandra a few times, so I¹d be
interested in an approach that makes that easier.
Is there a way to do it incrementally? Introduce the injection framework,
and convert a few classes (those required for startup), then slowly
convert the remainder?
peanut
There was some hope started in CASSANDRA-6881 - see some of the later comments:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6881
On 4 Jun 2014, at 04:04, Brian O'Neill wrote:
>
> Interesting proposition. We¹ve embedded Cassandra a few times, so I¹d be
> interested in an approach that make
Brandon Williams racontait le 03/06/2014 20:00:
> Relevant: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6881
Thanks for the pointer, couldn't find that issue.
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Simon Chemouil
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
Gary Dusbabek racontait le 03/06/2014 19:59:
> This has come up before. Let's face it, removing the singletons is a
> tempting proposition.
>
> Several of us have been down the path of trying to do it.
>
> At the end of the day, here's what you'd end up with (absolutely best case):
>
> 1. Modify
> (services not using other services)
meant services not used by other services
Simon Chemouil racontait le 03/06/2014 21:20:
> Gary Dusbabek racontait le 03/06/2014 19:59:
>> This has come up before. Let's face it, removing the singletons is a
>> tempting proposition.
>>
>> Several of us have bee
This is a relatively stupid comment, but i'm good at that so here goes.
The solution to several of these issues is,
Refactor 1 singleton use case, and post a patch.
1) less classes are involved
2) the review is more likely to be understood by one person
3) less chance for regression
4) marginal
> On 4 Jun 2014, at 7:24 am, Dave Brosius wrote:
>
> The solution to several of these issues is,
>
> Refactor 1 singleton use case, and post a patch.
+1 do it slowly
-1 for adding a dependency on a dependency injection framework. It's not
strictly needed if your goal is for removing singlet
It also means that problems that are introduced are bisectable, which
given these changes would be a real benefit.
It also means if the process doesn't go well, you won't hate reviewers
for life.
On 2014-06-03 17:24, Dave Brosius wrote:
This is a relatively stupid comment, but i'm good at
Update:
I'm planning to send out confirmations for half of the seats at the
end of June, and the other half two weeks later. We are definitely
going to fill this up, so don't wait until the last minute to apply!
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Want to contribute to Cass
12 matches
Mail list logo
