Let me sum up my thoughts so far.
Some of the most important goals of tick-tock were 1) predictable, regular
releases with manageable changesets and
2)individual releases that are more stable than in our previous process.
Now, we’ve already slipped a few times. Most recently with 3.6, and now w
-1
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko
wrote:
> Let me sum up my thoughts so far.
>
> Some of the most important goals of tick-tock were 1) predictable, regular
> releases with manageable changesets and
> 2)individual releases that are more stable than in our previous process.
>
>
I think -1 lacks a little clarity when responding to a block of prose with
multiple clauses, suggestions and no single proposition requiring a yes/no
answer.
As fun as it is to type -1.
On Thursday, 28 July 2016, Jake Luciani > wrote:
> -1
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko
Apologies, I was just changing my release vote to -1 from +1
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Benedict Elliott Smith wrote:
> I think -1 lacks a little clarity when responding to a block of prose with
> multiple clauses, suggestions and no single proposition requiring a yes/no
> answer.
>
> As f
Jake was just swapping his vote +1 to -1.
Swapping mine to -1 too, so that we have a binding -1 majority now.
Let’s get #12236 in and then decide what to do.
--
AY
On 28 July 2016 at 19:46:56, Benedict Elliott Smith (bened...@apache.org) wrote:
I think -1 lacks a little clarity when respondin
Option Two seems reasonable to me
---
On 2016-07-28 14:47, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote:
Jake was just swapping his vote +1 to -1.
Swapping mine to -1 too, so that we have a binding -1 majority now.
Let’s get #12236 in and then decide what to do.
--
AY
On 28 July 2016 at 19:46:56, Benedict El
Agreed, option #2 is my preference as well.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Dave Brosius
wrote:
> Option Two seems reasonable to me
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> On 2016-07-28 14:47, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote:
>
>> Jake was just swapping his vote +1 to -1.
>>
>> Swapping mine to -1 too, so that we have a bi
Thank you all. Since I dug through the thread, I count 3 binding +1, 4
binding -1, and 2 non-binding +1 votes :)
brandon +1 pmc
jake+1 pmc changed: -1
josh+1
alexsey +1 pmc changed: -1
pavel +1 pmc
robert +1
dave+1 pmc
sylvain -1 pmc
jonathan-1 pm
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko
wrote:
> 1. Release 3.8 as is now. It’s an even preview release that can live fine
> with one minor annoyance on upgrade. Have 3.9 released on schedule.
> Since the vote technically passed, we can just do it, now.
>
> 2. Wait until #12236 is in,
I change my vote to -1.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko
> wrote:
>
> > 1. Release 3.8 as is now. It’s an even preview release that can live fine
> > with one minor annoyance on upgrade. Have 3.9 released on schedule.
>
Also I believe Pavel may have switched tacitly to -1 with his "I agree with
Sylvain" email?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> I change my vote to -1.
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko
>> w
I am more -0 at this point, because I think we need to get our priorities
straight before even talking about dates and releases, that's why I wrote that
I agree with Sylvain.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> Also I believe Pavel may have switched
It sounds like most found the plain text email that Josh sent out yesterday
palatable, so I'll do the same. As always, feedback is welcome.
testall:
All pass! (again)
=
dtest:
scrub_test.TestScrubIndexes.test_standalone_scrub
CASSANDRA-12337, new flaky
13 matches
Mail list logo
