On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 7:54 PM, Durity, Sean R wrote:
>
>
> However, I think the shots at Cassandra are generally unfair. When I
> started working with it, the DataStax documentation was some of the best
> documentation I had seen on any project, especially an open source one.
>
Oh, don't get m
Please do send them! There was a *lot* of really hard great work by a lot of
people over the past year to significantly improve the documentation in tree.
http://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/
https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/trunk/doc
I still didn't see a reply from you re: my request
Jeff,
I already addressed everything you said. Boy! Would I like to bring up the out
of date articles on the web that trip people up and the lousy documentation on
the Apache website but I can’t because a lot of folks don’t know me or why I’m
saying these things.
I will be making a
Instead of saying "Make X better" you can quantify "Here's how we can make X
better" in a jira and the conversation will continue with interested parties
(opening jiras are free!). Being combative and insulting project on mailing
list may help vent some frustrations but it is counter productive
Hi all,
I'd like to deescalate a bit here.
Since this is an Apache and an OSS project, contributions come in many
forms: code, speaking/advocacy, documentation, support, project management,
and so on. None of these things come for free.
Ken, I appreciate you bring up these usability topics; they
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Kenneth Brotman <
kenbrot...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi Akash,
>
> I get the part about outside work which is why in replying to Jeff Jirsa I
> was suggesting the big companies could justify taking it on easy enough and
> you know actually pay the people who wo
The only progress from this point is what Jon said: enumerate and detail
your issues in jira tickets.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Kenneth Brotman <
kenbrot...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi Akash,
>
> I get the part about outside work which is why in replying to Jeff Jirsa I
> was suggesting
> 1. It seems that for example when RF=3, each one of the three base replicas
> will send a view update to the fourth "pending node". While this is not
> wrong, it's also inefficient - why send three copies of the same update?
> Wouldn't it be more efficient that just one of the base replicas -
Hi Akash,
I get the part about outside work which is why in replying to Jeff Jirsa I was
suggesting the big companies could justify taking it on easy enough and you
know actually pay the people who would be working at it so those people could
have a life.
The part I don't get is the aversion t
I would second Jon in the arguments he made. Contributing outside work is
draining and really requires a lot of commitment. If someone requires
features around usability etc, just pay for it, period.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Kenneth Brotman <
kenbrot...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> Jon,
>
kenneth: could you please send your jira information? i'm unable to even find
an account on http://issues.apache.org with your name despite multiple
attempts. thanks!
best,
kjellman
> On Feb 21, 2018, at 2:20 PM, Kenneth Brotman
> wrote:
>
> Jon,
>
> Very sorry that you don't see the value
Jon,
Very sorry that you don't see the value of the time I'm taking for this. I
don't have demands; I do have a stern warning and I'm right Jon. Please be
very careful not to mischaracterized my words Jon.
You suggest I put things in JIRA's, then seem to suggest that I'd be lucky if
anyone l
So before buying any marketing claims from Microsoft or whoever, maybe
should you try to use it extensively ?
And talking about backup, have a look at DynamoDB:
http://i68.tinypic.com/n1b6yr.jpg
>From my POV, if a multi-billions company like Amazon doesn't get it right
or can't make it easy for e
Ken,
Maybe it’s not clear how open source projects work, so let me try to explain.
There’s a bunch of us who either get paid by someone or volunteer on our free
time. The folks that get paid, (yay!) usually take direction on what the
priorities are, and work on projects that directly affect o
It is instructive to listen to the concerns of new and existing users in order
to improve a product like Cassandra, but I think the school yard taunt model
isn’t the most effective.
In my experience with open and closed source databases, there are always things
that could be improved. Many have
Josh,
To say nothing is indifference. If you care about your community, sometimes
don't you have to bring up a subject even though you know it's also temporarily
adding some discomfort?
As to opening a JIRA, I've got a very specific topic to try in mind now. An
easy one I'll work on and
Hello Apache Supporters and Enthusiasts
This is your FINAL reminder that the Call for Papers (CFP) for the
Apache EU Roadshow is closing soon. Our Apache EU Roadshow will focus on
Cloud, IoT, Apache Tomcat, Apache Http and will run from 13-14 June 2018
in Berlin.
Note that the CFP deadline has
There's a disheartening amount of "here's where Cassandra is bad, and
here's what it needs to do for me for free" happening in this thread.
This is open-source software. Everyone is *strongly encouraged* to submit a
patch to move the needle on *any* of these things being complained about in
this t
Hi, I was trying to understand how view tables are updated during a period
of range movements, namely bootstrapping of a new node or decommissioning
one of the nodes. In particular, during the period of data streaming, we
can have a new replica on a "pending node" to which we also need to send
the
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Kenneth Brotman <
kenbrot...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> Cluster wide management should be a big theme in any next major release.
> >>
> >Na. Stability and testing should be a big theme in the next major release.
> >
>
> Double Na on that one Jeff. I think y
20 matches
Mail list logo
