[ANNOUNCE] Apache Cassandra 4.1.0 test artifact available

2022-11-22 Thread Mick Semb Wever
The test build of Cassandra 4.1.0 is available. This is an early staging announcement. sha1: b807f97b37933fac251020dbd949ee8ef245b158 Git: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.1.0-tentative Maven Artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/

[RELEASE] Apache Cassandra 4.1-rc1 released

2022-11-22 Thread Mick Semb Wever
The Cassandra team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Cassandra version 4.1-rc1. Apache Cassandra is a fully distributed database. It is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance. http://cassandra.apache.org/ Downloads of source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-rc1

2022-11-22 Thread Mick Semb Wever
Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.1-rc1 for release. > > … > > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has > tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered > binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's. > T

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-25: Trie-indexed SSTable format

2022-11-22 Thread Benedict
I don’t think there’s any requirement to run general testing with every storage variant, except perhaps pre-release. The idea is to look for regressions in the modified areas of the codebase, and if the storage layer hasn’t been changed it doesn’t make sense to confuse or slow down testing IMO.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-rc1

2022-11-22 Thread Andrés de la Peña
+1 On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 19:55, Josh McKenzie wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022, at 12:38 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > > On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 at 13:10, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.1-rc1 for release. > > sha1: d6822c45ae3d476bc2ff674cedf7d4107b8ca2d0

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-25: Trie-indexed SSTable format

2022-11-22 Thread Josh McKenzie
Strong +1 for the proposal here. > One of the questions that we want to ask is whether anyone objects to > maintaining full compatibility with existing files created by DataStax > Enterprise. No concerns here. So long as it's clear in the implementation what it is and why it's there I don't see

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-25: Trie-indexed SSTable format

2022-11-22 Thread Jacek Lewandowski
+1 for the proposal ! btw. regarding tests - perhaps we will have to let Python DTests run with either new or old format thanks - - -- --- - - Jacek Lewandowski On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 3:06 PM Benedict wrote: > Yes of course, this was absolutely just a query and not a