Re: [DISCUSS] Conducting a User Survey

2023-07-11 Thread Mick Semb Wever
Looks good to me, thanks Patrick. On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 at 03:11, Patrick McFadin wrote: > > For quite a few years, I have done Twitter polls to gather helpful > information about how people use Apache Cassandra. Twitter is no longer the > best place to conduct this kind of activity since it has

Re: Bloom filter calculation

2023-07-11 Thread Benedict
I’m not sure I follow your reasoning. The bloom filter table is false positive per sstable given the number of bits *per key*. So for 10 keys you would have 200 bits, which yields the same false positive rate as 20 bits and 1 key. It does taper slightly at much larger N, but it’s pretty nominal

Re: Bloom filter calculation

2023-07-11 Thread Claude Warren, Jr via dev
I think we are talking past each other here. What I was missing was the size of the filter. I was assuming that the size of the filter was the number of bits specified in the BloomFilterCalculations (error on my part), what I was missing was the multiplication of the number of bits by the number

Re: Changing the output of tooling between majors

2023-07-11 Thread Francisco Guerrero
I am +1 (nb) on the proposal to change the human readable output in a major release as long as we have a machine readable output that can be consumed by scripts. On 2023/07/10 23:06:11 "Fleming, Jackson" wrote: > We use Nodetool in scripts sparsely, in my opinion trying to programmatically > pa

Re: [DISCUSS] Allow UPDATE on settings virtual table to change running configuration

2023-07-11 Thread Maxim Muzafarov
Thank you for your comments and for sharing the ticket targeting strategy, I'm really happy to see this page where I have found all the answers to the questions I had. So, I tend towards your view and will just land this ticket on the 5.0 release only for now as it makes sense for me as well. I di

Re: Fwd: [DISCUSS] Formalizing requirements for pre-commit patches on new CI

2023-07-11 Thread Derek Chen-Becker
A strong +1 to getting to a single CI system. CircleCI definitely has some niceties and I understand why it's currently used, but right now we get 2 CI systems for twice the price. +1 on the proposed subsets. Derek On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:37 AM Josh McKenzie wrote: > I'm personally not thinki

Re: [DISCUSS] Conducting a User Survey

2023-07-11 Thread C. Scott Andreas
Thanks Patrick. I like the idea of a user survey.Added a handful of comments in the doc. 👍– ScottOn Jul 11, 2023, at 12:51 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:Looks good to me, thanks Patrick.On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 at 03:11, Patrick McFadin wrote:For quite a few years, I have done Twitter polls to gather

Re: Fwd: [DISCUSS] Formalizing requirements for pre-commit patches on new CI

2023-07-11 Thread Josh McKenzie
> 2: Pre-commit 'devBranch' full suite for high risk/disruptive merges: at > reviewer's discretion In general, maybe offering a dev the option of choosing either "pre-commit smoke" or "post-commit full" at their discretion for any work would be the right play. A follow-on thought: even with som

Re: [DISCUSS] Conducting a User Survey

2023-07-11 Thread German Eichberger via dev
Same. Great idea. How ill the results be published? Thanks, German From: C. Scott Andreas Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 7:41 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Cc: dev@cassandra.apache.org ; market...@cassandra.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Conductin

Re: CASSANDRA-18554 - mTLS based client and internode authenticators

2023-07-11 Thread Dinesh Joshi
folks - I think we’ve achieved lazy consensus here. Please continue with feedback on the jira.Thanks,DineshOn Jul 7, 2023, at 12:23 PM, Jyothsna Konisa wrote:Hi Yuki, Jeremiah & Christopher,Thank you very much for the feedback. Regarding removing superuser check for adding/removing identities, I

Re: CASSANDRA-18554 - mTLS based client and internode authenticators

2023-07-11 Thread Derek Chen-Becker
EC - eventual consensus? On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 4:03 PM Dinesh Joshi wrote: > folks - I think we’ve achieved lazy consensus here. Please continue with > feedback on the jira. > > Thanks, > > Dinesh > > > On Jul 7, 2023, at 12:23 PM, Jyothsna Konisa > wrote: > >  > Hi Yuki, Jeremiah & Christop

Re: CASSANDRA-18554 - mTLS based client and internode authenticators

2023-07-11 Thread Yuki Morishita
> folks - I think we’ve achieved lazy consensus here. Please continue with feedback on the jira. Hi Dinesh, As Jeremiah commented on JIRA, shouldn't we have a vote in the ML? For the future reference, in my opinion, adding new CQL syntax should have a CEP as it is not something we can easily cha

Re: Fwd: [DISCUSS] Formalizing requirements for pre-commit patches on new CI

2023-07-11 Thread Berenguer Blasi
On our 4.0 release I remember a number of such failures but not recently. What is more common though is packaging errors, cdc/compression/system_ks_directory targeted fixes, CI w/wo upgrade tests, being less responsive post-commit as you already moved on,... Either the smoke pre-commit has appr

Re: Changing the output of tooling between majors

2023-07-11 Thread Miklosovic, Stefan
I agree with Jackson that having a different output format (JSON/YAML) in order to be able to change the default output resolves nothing in practice. As Jackson said, "operators who maintain these scripts aren’t going to re-write them just because a better way of doing them is newly available, u