>1. No. CQL did not "hurt me" and I'm not advocating we preserve CQL for
posterity. Quite the opposite. I know you weren't at CoC, but my
presentation was about how we move forward as a project. It will be
available soon as a recording, but you can view the slides here:
https://drive.google.com/fil
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 12:05 PM Patrick McFadin wrote:
>
> Generally, I'm -1 for adding more custom syntax. Another concern of mine
> is adding control plane actions in DDL. I understand the usefulness of a
> feature like this in ops. It's a great idea.. Here would be my counter
> proposal:
>
>
Could I make a suggestion? Well, I will make a suggestion :-) , but if
it's not useful then feel free to ignore it.
Could we talk a bit about how users/operators would work with the CREATE
ROLE features you're proposing?
The use-case as I understand it is that there are organizations that
ha
1. No. CQL did not "hurt me" and I'm not advocating we preserve CQL for
posterity. Quite the opposite. I know you weren't at CoC, but my
presentation was about how we move forward as a project. It will be
available soon as a recording, but you can view the slides here:
https://drive.google.com/file
Oh crap, what a feedback! If nothing else this shows a lesson to everybody
that the most sure way to have a fast feedback if you are tired of waiting
or impatient so you can move quickly is to just propose your ideas, then
boldly proclaim you go to do something and the universe will mysteriously
ta
Hi all,
I’m also leaning towards a -1 (non-binding) on this.
From what I know, none of the other major SQL databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL
Server, Oracle) provide this feature either. These systems have been around
longer and have broader adoption, which makes me think it’s reasonable for thi
+1 (non-binding)
From: Josh McKenzie
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2025 at 2:14 PM
To: dev
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] CEP-51: Support Include Semantics for
cassandra.yaml
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you can
+1
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025, at 1:30 PM, Joel Shepherd wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On 9/16/2025 1:02 AM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> > Hello Everyone 👋,
> >
> > I’m initiating the vote on CEP-51
> >
> > You can find the proposal here:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-51+Sup
Thanks Mick, I'm just digging into this more after a long week of travel.
Generally, I'm -1 for adding more custom syntax. Another concern of mine is
adding control plane actions in DDL. I understand the usefulness of a
feature like this in ops. It's a great idea.. Here would be my counter
proposa
+1 (non-binding)
On 9/16/2025 1:02 AM, Johnny Miller wrote:
Hello Everyone 👋,
I’m initiating the vote on CEP-51
You can find the proposal here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-51+Support+Include+Semantics+for+cassandra.yaml
And the associated discussion thread is
> I think enough time passed for everybody to participate in the discussion so
> I would just move on and start the voting thread soon.
Can we give CEP discussions longer than ~one week, please.
Folk are easily away/offline for a whole week. Take for example many who were
at Communi
Thank you everybody for the participation.
TLDR from this thread:
- rate limiting is out of scope, indeed valuable but should be treated more
robustly outside this CEP
- CREATE GENERATED ROLE WITH password = '123' as well as CREATE ROLE abc
WITH GENERATED PASSWORD will for sure work
- an operato
I respect your opinion about this but I just view it differently. There are
about 40 methods in SidecarClient. Some of them are purely technical
endpoints between Spark job + Sidecar and similar. CLI is for an operator
of a cluster to use primarily. I do not think that every endpoint is going
to be
Hello Everyone 👋,
I’m initiating the vote on CEP-51
You can find the proposal here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-51+Support+Include+Semantics+for+cassandra.yaml
And the associated discussion thread is available here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/wm41gtj2nbmz5166g
14 matches
Mail list logo
