Re: [DISCUSS] Replace airlift/airline library with Picocli

I don’t usually chime in but I’m a +1 on PicoCLI. I think it’s a great project and the autocompletion features are a game changer for people like me who prefer the CLI and use many CLI tools infrequently. The coloured output is… nice, I guess. Whatever the decision, I think at a strategic level

Re: Welcome Patrick McFadin as Cassandra Committer

Congrats Patrick! > On 7 Feb 2023, at 11:59 am, Anthony Grasso wrote: > > Congratulations, Patrick! > > Well deserved given all the work you do for the community. > > Kind regards, > > On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 11:39, Paulo Motta > wrote: >> Congratulations for t

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-15: General Purpose Transactions

If Accord can fulfil its aims it sounds like a huge improvement to the state of the art in distributed transaction processing. Congrats to all involved in pulling the proposal together. I was holding off on feedback since this is quite in depth and I don’t want to bike shed, I still haven’t sp

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements

Aug 22, 2021, at 7:25 PM, Miles Garnsey >> wrote: >> >>  >>> >>> The problem is that today there’s no way to reliably exclude the new DC >>> from serving reads, that I know of? If you can, then yes you would only >>> need to ensure repair

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements

can maintain these > properties through any topology change. > > But we’ll probably have people using legacy CLs for another decade, so we’re > going to have to support people querying with those CLs, but we might want to > encourage people to disable them on their clusters and migrate

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements

ot specify their consistency levels. This way the > database can configure arbitrary quorums, and also guarantee that these > quorums provide the desired consistency. > > > From: Miles Garnsey > Date: Friday, 20 August 2021 at 00:47 > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org >

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements

Long time listener, first time caller here - hello! I am very interested in this part "Better safety among range movements: Electorate verification during range movements provides a stronger assertion of linearizability via assurance of the set of instances voting on a transaction.” I have see